主观酒精反应的语境影响。
Contextual influences on subjective alcohol response.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
出版信息
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):48-58. doi: 10.1037/pha0000415. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Prior research demonstrates contextual influences on drug responses in both animals and humans, although studies in humans typically focus on only one aspect of context (e.g., social) and examine a limited range of subjective experiences. The current study sought to address these limitations by examining the impact of both social and physical context on the full range of subjective alcohol effects. The sample included 448 young adult social drinkers (57% male, 66.5% White) randomly assigned to consume alcohol (target blood alcohol concentration of .08 g%) or placebo in 1 of 4 contexts (solitary lab, group lab, solitary bar, group bar). Results indicated that high arousal positive (HAP) effects of alcohol (e.g., talkative, lively) were stronger in nonbar relative to bar contexts and that low arousal positive (LAP) effects (e.g., relaxed, calm) were only present in the group lab context. There were also main effects of social context such that high arousal effects (both positive and negative) were stronger in group contexts, regardless of beverage condition. These findings highlight the importance of considering context when examining alcohol effects. Studies designed to isolate pharmacological HAP effects may benefit from a nonbar setting, and studies of LAP effects might be most effective in a simulated living room or home environment, although future studies are needed to directly address this possibility. Further, studies with an explicit focus on expectancies or that need strong control for expectancies might benefit from a group context, particularly when studying high arousal effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,药物反应受到动物和人类环境因素的影响,尽管人类研究通常仅关注环境的一个方面(例如社交),并考察有限范围的主观体验。本研究旨在通过考察社会和物理环境对各种主观酒精效应的影响来解决这些局限性。该样本包括 448 名年轻成年社交饮酒者(57%为男性,66.5%为白人),他们被随机分配到 4 种环境中的 1 种中摄入酒精(目标血液酒精浓度为 0.08 g%)或安慰剂:单独实验室、小组实验室、单独酒吧、小组酒吧。结果表明,与酒吧环境相比,非酒吧环境中酒精的高唤醒积极(HAP)效应(例如健谈、活泼)更强,而低唤醒积极(LAP)效应(例如放松、平静)仅出现在小组实验室环境中。社会环境也有主要影响,无论饮料状况如何,高唤醒效应(积极和消极)在小组环境中更强。这些发现强调了在研究酒精效应时考虑环境的重要性。旨在分离药理学 HAP 效应的研究可能受益于非酒吧环境,而 LAP 效应的研究在模拟客厅或家庭环境中最有效,尽管需要进一步研究来直接解决这种可能性。此外,那些特别关注预期或需要对预期进行严格控制的研究可能会受益于小组环境,尤其是在研究高唤醒效应时。
相似文献
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021-2
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022-6
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015-2
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018-10
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011-5-30
引用本文的文献
Psychol Addict Behav. 2025-8
Addiction. 2025-4
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024-4
本文引用的文献
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020-12
Addict Behav. 2020-3
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018-5
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017-5
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016-1