Acuff Samuel F, Padovano Hayley Treloar, Carpenter Ryan W, Emery Noah N, Miranda Robert
Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Apr;48(4):755-765. doi: 10.1111/acer.15286. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
Drinking commonly occurs in social settings and may bolster social reinforcement. Laboratory studies suggest that subjective effects and mood are mechanisms through which the social context influences alcohol consumption. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) may be useful for extending these findings to the natural environment. This pre-registered secondary analysis of EMA data investigated the influence of the social environment on: (1) stimulating and sedating subjective effects of alcohol, (2) contentedness and negative affect, and (3) next-day evaluations of the drinking occasion.
Nontreatment seeking adults reporting past-month heavy drinking (N = 131; M = 28.09; 42% female) completed 7 days of EMA (in the morning, at random, and following drinking prompts), which included questions on their social context (drinking in the presence of known others or alone), contemporaneous stimulating and sedating effects, contentedness and negative affect, alcohol consumption, and next-day evaluations of a prior day's drinking event (how satisfying/pleasant was drinking). We used multi-level models in SAS 9.4 M7 software to examine relations among the variables.
Contemporaneous subjective effects (stimulating or sedating), negative affect, and contentedness did not significantly depend on the social context. For next-day evaluations of pleasure/satisfaction from drinking, context effects were dependent on consumption totals. As the total number of standard drinks consumed increased, recollections of pleasure/satisfaction were higher when drinking had occurred with others, relative to alone. At lower consumption totals, next-day evaluations did not appear to depend on social context.
When reported contemporaneously, subjective effects and affect do not appear dependent upon the presence of known others. However, heavier drinking events, relative to lighter drinking events, are appraised more favorably the following day when occurring within social contexts.
饮酒通常发生在社交场合,可能会增强社会强化作用。实验室研究表明,主观效应和情绪是社会环境影响酒精消费的机制。生态瞬时评估(EMA)可能有助于将这些发现扩展到自然环境中。这项对EMA数据进行的预先注册的二次分析研究了社会环境对以下方面的影响:(1)酒精的刺激和镇静主观效应,(2)满足感和负面影响,以及(3)对饮酒场合的次日评价。
报告过去一个月大量饮酒的未寻求治疗的成年人(N = 131;M = 28.09;42%为女性)完成了7天的EMA(早上、随机以及在饮酒提示后),其中包括关于他们社会环境(在认识的人面前饮酒或独自饮酒)、同时期的刺激和镇静效应、满足感和负面影响、酒精消费以及对前一天饮酒事件的次日评价(饮酒有多令人满意/愉快)的问题。我们使用SAS 9.4 M7软件中的多层次模型来检验变量之间的关系。
同时期的主观效应(刺激或镇静)、负面影响和满足感并不显著取决于社会环境。对于饮酒带来的愉悦/满意度的次日评价,情境效应取决于消费总量。随着标准饮酒总量的增加,与独自饮酒相比,与他人一起饮酒时对愉悦/满意度的回忆更高。在较低的消费总量下,次日评价似乎不取决于社会环境。
当同时报告时,主观效应和情感似乎不依赖于认识的人的在场。然而,与较轻的饮酒事件相比,较重的饮酒事件在社交情境中发生时,次日的评价更积极。