• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用美国患者在线评论评估牙科护理的患者体验和医疗保健质量:混合方法研究。

Assessing Patient Experience and Healthcare Quality of Dental Care Using Patient Online Reviews in the United States: Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

College of Dental Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, United States.

College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e18652. doi: 10.2196/18652.

DOI:10.2196/18652
PMID:32673240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7380989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, patient review websites have emerged as an essential online platform for doctor ratings and reviews. Recent studies suggested the significance of such websites as a data source for patients to choose doctors for healthcare providers to learn and improve from patient feedback and to foster a culture of trust and transparency between patients and healthcare providers. However, as compared to other medical specialties, studies of online patient reviews that focus on dentists in the United States remain absent.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to understand to what extent online patient reviews can provide performance feedbacks that reflect dental care quality and patient experience.

METHODS

Using mixed informatics methods incorporating statistics, natural language processing, and domain expert evaluation, we analyzed the online patient reviews of 204,751 dentists extracted from HealthGrades with two specific aims. First, we examined the associations between patient ratings and a variety of dentist characteristics. Second, we identified topics from patient reviews that can be mapped to the national assessment of dental patient experience measured by the Patient Experience Measures from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Dental Plan Survey.

RESULTS

Higher ratings were associated with female dentists (t=2.45, P<.01, g=0.01), dentists at a younger age (F=246.97, P<.001, g=0.11), and those whose patients experienced a short wait time (F=10417.77, P<0.001, g=0.18). We also identified several topics that corresponded to CAHPS measures, including discomfort (eg, painful/painless root canal or deep cleaning), and ethics (eg, high-pressure sales, and unnecessary dental work).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that online patient reviews could be used as a data source for understanding the patient experience and healthcare quality in dentistry.

摘要

背景

在过去的二十年中,患者评论网站已成为医生评分和评论的重要在线平台。最近的研究表明,这些网站作为患者选择医生的数据源的重要性,为医疗服务提供者提供了从患者反馈中学习和改进的机会,并促进了患者和医疗服务提供者之间的信任和透明文化。然而,与其他医学专业相比,关于美国牙医的在线患者评论研究仍然缺乏。

目的

本研究旨在了解在线患者评论在多大程度上可以提供反映牙科护理质量和患者体验的绩效反馈。

方法

使用混合信息学方法,结合统计学、自然语言处理和领域专家评估,我们分析了从 HealthGrades 提取的 204751 名牙医的在线患者评论,有两个具体目标。首先,我们检查了患者评分与各种牙医特征之间的关联。其次,我们从患者评论中确定了可以映射到国家评估的主题,该评估是通过医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(CAHPS)牙科计划调查中的患者体验措施来衡量的。

结果

更高的评分与女性牙医(t=2.45,P<.01,g=0.01)、年轻牙医(F=246.97,P<.001,g=0.11)和等待时间短的患者的牙医有关(F=10417.77,P<0.001,g=0.18)。我们还确定了几个与 CAHPS 测量值相对应的主题,包括不适(例如,根管治疗或深度清洁时的疼痛/无痛)和道德(例如,高压销售和不必要的牙科工作)。

结论

这些发现表明,在线患者评论可以用作理解牙科患者体验和医疗保健质量的数据源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/19ddaebebe0d/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/f672dfb4e609/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/752707c21a7a/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/e1820db75d53/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/3b9f45d3e99f/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/19ddaebebe0d/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/f672dfb4e609/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/752707c21a7a/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/e1820db75d53/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/3b9f45d3e99f/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d00/7380989/19ddaebebe0d/jmir_v22i7e18652_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Patient Experience and Healthcare Quality of Dental Care Using Patient Online Reviews in the United States: Mixed Methods Study.使用美国患者在线评论评估牙科护理的患者体验和医疗保健质量:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e18652. doi: 10.2196/18652.
2
Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.面部整形外科医生的在线评分:传统患者体验调查的有益补充。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;23(2):78-89. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0049. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.中国医疗消费者之声:一种基于网络医生评价的文本挖掘方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430.
4
Online Reviews of Hemodialysis Centers Correlate With Medicare and Medicaid Survey Measures of Patient Experience.血液透析中心的在线评论与医疗保险和医疗补助调查衡量患者体验的指标相关。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2021;30(4):213-218. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000314.
5
A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.两个国家的故事:中美在线医生评价的国际比较
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.流量来源以及访客对在线质量公开报告的偏好:网络分析与在线调查结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.
7
How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.社交媒体、培训和人口统计学如何影响三大脊柱外科医生在线评论网站上的在线评论。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2081-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.消费者对复杂信息环境下患者体验测量的反应。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S56-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826c84e1.
9
Older Adult Patients' Experience of Care in a Dental School Clinic.老年患者在牙科学院诊所的就医体验。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Sep;83(9):1039-1046. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.104. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
What Do Patients Care About? Mining Fine-grained Patient Concerns from Online Physician Reviews Through Computer-Assisted Multi-level Qualitative Analysis.患者关心什么?通过计算机辅助多层次定性分析从在线医生评论中挖掘精细的患者关注点。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:544-553. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Natural Language Processing to Interpret Unstructured Patient Feedback on Health Services: Scoping Review.利用自然语言处理解读关于医疗服务的非结构化患者反馈:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e72853. doi: 10.2196/72853.
2
Natural Language Understanding to Assess Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study Incorporating a Mixed Methods Approach.用于评估口腔健康相关生活质量的自然语言理解:一项采用混合方法的横断面研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Sep;52(9):1377-1385. doi: 10.1111/joor.13986. Epub 2025 May 9.
3
A study of dentists' explanations and patient-dentist communication among older adults in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews.患者在网上如何评价医生?关于患者在线评价研究的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 8;21(4):e12521. doi: 10.2196/12521.
2
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.在线患者体验评分:急诊科与紧急护理中心。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
An Assessment of Online Reviews of Hand Surgeons.手部外科医生在线评论评估
一项针对日本老年人群中牙医解释和医患沟通的研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1163. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04910-6.
4
Investigating Patient Satisfaction Through Web-Based Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: Quantitative Study Using the Meaning Extraction Method.通过对挪威牙医的在线评价调查患者满意度:使用意义提取法的定量研究
J Particip Med. 2024 May 3;16:e49262. doi: 10.2196/49262.
5
Measuring the impact of dental service quality on revisit intention using an extended SERVQUAL model.使用扩展的SERVQUAL模型衡量牙科服务质量对复诊意愿的影响。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Apr 12;5:1362659. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1362659. eCollection 2024.
6
Russian-language translation and cultural adaptation of the Norwegian 'Patient Experience Questionnaire'.挪威《患者体验问卷》的俄语翻译及文化调适
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 7;2:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100174. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Face time with physicians: How do patients assess providers in video-visits?与医生面对面交流:患者如何评估视频问诊中的医疗服务提供者?
Heliyon. 2023 Jun;9(6):e16883. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16883. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
8
The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.矛盾态度对基于网络的评论有用性的影响:来自大型医师评论网站的数据分析的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 29;25:e38306. doi: 10.2196/38306.
9
The Relationship between Internet Patient Satisfaction Ratings and COVID-19 Outcomes.互联网患者满意度评分与新冠病毒病结局之间的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 12;11(10):1411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101411.
10
Assessing reviews of academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons within the US on Healthgrades.评估美国 Healthgrades 网站上对学术口腔颌面外科医生的评价。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01146-6. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 May;5(3):139-144.
4
Physician age and outcomes in elderly patients in hospital in the US: observational study.美国住院老年患者的医生年龄与治疗结果:观察性研究
BMJ. 2017 May 16;357:j1797. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1797.
5
A tale of two countries: International comparison of online doctor reviews between China and the United States.两个国家的故事:中美在线医生评价的国际比较
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.007. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians.男性与女性医生治疗的医疗保险患者的医院死亡率和再入院率比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):206-213. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
7
Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.评估现代运动医学外科医生的“质量”:对热门医生在线评级网站的分析。
HSS J. 2016 Oct;12(3):272-277. doi: 10.1007/s11420-016-9520-x. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.中国医疗消费者之声:一种基于网络医生评价的文本挖掘方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430.
9
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
10
The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.中国在线医生评价的发展:对中国最大的在线医生评价网站的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 1;17(6):e134. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4365.