• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在受战争影响、资源有限的环境中评估MPM III和SAPS III预后模型:来自加沙地带的一项前瞻性研究。

Evaluating the MPM III and SAPS III prognostic models in a war-affected, resource-limited setting: a prospective study from the Gaza Strip.

作者信息

Aldabbour Belal, Elhissi Ahmed J H, Abudaqqa Hamza, Alqrinawi Jaser, Badran Mohammed, Sulaiman Mohammed, Alsoos Yousef, Altartour Yousef, Abulebda Mohammed, Muhaisen Mohammed, Alsafadi Omar, Assaf Zuhair

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, P.O. Box 108, Gaza, State of Palestine.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 6;25(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12833-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12833-3
PMID:40329400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054265/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Validation studies of prognostic models used in critical care have yet to be conducted in Palestine. The intense conflict in the Gaza Strip presents an opportunity to evaluate the performance of local ICUs and validate the performance of the MPM and SAPS models within a resource-limited and highly stressed healthcare system.

METHODS

A prospective study conducted from October to December 2024 included all patients admitted to ICUs in three of the four critical care units operating in the Gaza Strip. Sociodemographic, clinical, physiological, and laboratory parameters were collected, along with information regarding the clinical course and ICU outcomes. The MPM-III and SAPS-III scores were calculated, and their discrimination and calibration were assessed using AUROC and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. Furthermore, the difference between the predicted and actual mortality rates was visualized, and standardized mortality rates (SMR) were calculated. Except for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using R Studio.

RESULTS

The cohort included 101 patients, of whom 72.27% were surgical cases and 58.41% were admitted from the ER. The ICU mortality rate was 30.69%. The median duration of ICU admission was four days [IQR 2-9] and was significantly longer for surgical cases than for medical cases. Physiological and laboratory parameters, along with interventions associated with higher mortality, included a lower GCS, burns, elevated leukocyte and platelet counts, lower PPO2, dysrhythmias, intracranial mass effect, and the need for mechanical ventilation or central venous catheterization. The predicted mortality rates were 16.63% for MPM0-III and 16.82% for SAPS-III. SMRs indicated that both models underestimated ICU mortality (SMR, MPM0-III 1.85; SAPS-III 1.83), with the discrepancy more likely to occur in high-risk patients. ROC curves demonstrated acceptable to good discriminatory power for both models (AUROC, MPM0-III 0.79 (95% CI 0.7-0.88); SAPS-III 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.94)). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded statistically insignificant results for both models, indicating good calibration.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of critical care units in the Gaza Strip during the studied period of the war were comparable to those of other hospitals in the West Bank and other LMICs without active conflicts. The MPM-III and SAPS-III demonstrated good discrimination and calibration, making them valid tools for enhancing ICU performance and improving resource utilization in the Gaza Strip.

摘要

背景

巴勒斯坦尚未对重症监护中使用的预后模型进行验证研究。加沙地带的激烈冲突为评估当地重症监护病房的表现以及在资源有限且压力巨大的医疗系统中验证MPM和SAPS模型的表现提供了契机。

方法

2024年10月至12月进行的一项前瞻性研究纳入了加沙地带四个重症监护病房中三个病房收治的所有患者。收集了社会人口统计学、临床、生理和实验室参数,以及有关临床病程和重症监护病房结局的信息。计算了MPM-III和SAPS-III评分,并分别使用AUROC和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估其辨别力和校准情况。此外,还直观展示了预测死亡率与实际死亡率之间的差异,并计算了标准化死亡率(SMR)。除Hosmer-Lemeshow检验外,p值小于0.05被视为具有统计学意义。所有统计分析均使用R Studio进行。

结果

该队列包括101名患者,其中72.27%为外科病例,58.41%从急诊室收治。重症监护病房死亡率为30.69%。重症监护病房住院时间中位数为4天[四分位间距2 - 9],外科病例明显长于内科病例。生理和实验室参数以及与较高死亡率相关的干预措施包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较低、烧伤、白细胞和血小板计数升高、动脉血氧分压较低、心律失常、颅内占位效应以及需要机械通气或中心静脉置管。MPM0 - III的预测死亡率为16.63%,SAPS - III为16.82%。标准化死亡率表明这两个模型均低估了重症监护病房死亡率(SMR,MPM0 - III为1.85;SAPS - III为1.83),差异在高危患者中更可能出现。ROC曲线显示这两个模型的辨别力均可接受至良好(AUROC,MPM0 - III为0.79(95%CI0.7 - 0.88);SAPS - III为0.87(95%CI0.80 - 0.94))。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验对两个模型均得出无统计学意义的结果,表明校准良好。

结论

在所研究的战争期间,加沙地带重症监护病房的结局与约旦河西岸其他医院以及其他无冲突的低收入和中等收入国家的医院相当。MPM-III和SAPS-III表现出良好的辨别力和校准能力,使其成为提高加沙地带重症监护病房表现和改善资源利用的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/dce5b358c0f4/12913_2025_12833_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/6f1c0e12689a/12913_2025_12833_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/3a5a4a42d479/12913_2025_12833_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/dce5b358c0f4/12913_2025_12833_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/6f1c0e12689a/12913_2025_12833_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/3a5a4a42d479/12913_2025_12833_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/12054265/dce5b358c0f4/12913_2025_12833_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the MPM III and SAPS III prognostic models in a war-affected, resource-limited setting: a prospective study from the Gaza Strip.在受战争影响、资源有限的环境中评估MPM III和SAPS III预后模型:来自加沙地带的一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 6;25(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12833-3.
2
Performance in mortality prediction of SAPS 3 And MPM-III scores among adult patients admitted to the ICU of a private tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study.坦桑尼亚一家私立三级转诊医院重症监护病房成年患者中SAPS 3和MPM-III评分在死亡率预测中的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 16;9:e12332. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12332. eCollection 2021.
3
Predicting Mortality in Low-Income Country ICUs: The Rwanda Mortality Probability Model (R-MPM).预测低收入国家重症监护病房的死亡率:卢旺达死亡率概率模型(R-MPM)。
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155858. eCollection 2016.
4
Simplified prognostic model for critically ill patients in resource limited settings in South Asia.南亚资源有限环境下危重症患者简化预后模型。
Crit Care. 2017 Oct 17;21(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1843-6.
5
Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study.四项预后评分在巴西重症监护病房癌症患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1188-95. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1807-7. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
6
The SAPS 3 score as a predictor of hospital mortality in a South African tertiary intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study.SAPS 3 评分对南非一家三级重症监护病房住院患者病死率的预测价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233317. eCollection 2020.
7
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
8
Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.在一个大型苏格兰数据库中对五种重症监护评分模型的性能评估。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00023.
9
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
10
The predictive performance of the SAPS II and SAPS 3 scoring systems: A retrospective analysis.序贯器官衰竭评估Ⅱ(SAPS Ⅱ)和序贯器官衰竭评估3(SAPS 3)评分系统的预测性能:一项回顾性分析。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring maternal and neonatal health in a conflict-affected setting: cross-sectional findings from Gaza.在受冲突影响地区探索孕产妇和新生儿健康:加沙地区的横断面研究结果
Confl Health. 2025 Jul 17;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00687-9.
2
Quality of life and access to healthcare among hemodialysis patients during wartime: cross-sectional insights from Gaza.战时血液透析患者的生活质量与医疗服务可及性:来自加沙的横断面见解
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04322-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Psychological Toll of War and Forced Displacement in Gaza: A Study on Anxiety, PTSD, and Depression.加沙战争与被迫流离失所造成的心理创伤:一项关于焦虑、创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的研究。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2025 Apr 16;9:24705470251334943. doi: 10.1177/24705470251334943. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Traumatic injury mortality in the Gaza Strip from Oct 7, 2023, to June 30, 2024: a capture-recapture analysis.2023年10月7日至2024年6月30日加沙地带创伤性损伤死亡率:捕获-再捕获分析
Lancet. 2025 Feb 8;405(10477):469-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02678-3. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
Food insecurity and weight loss during wartime: a mixed-design study from the Gaza Strip.
战时的粮食不安全与体重减轻:来自加沙地带的一项混合设计研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Dec 20;43(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00700-6.
4
Psychological impacts of the Gaza war on Palestinian young adults: a cross-sectional study of depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD symptoms.加沙战争对巴勒斯坦青年成年人心理影响的横断面研究:抑郁、焦虑、压力和 PTSD 症状的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 26;12(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02188-5.
5
Are hospitals collateral damage? Assessing geospatial proximity of 2000 lb bomb detonations to hospital facilities in the Gaza Strip from October 7 to November 17, 2023.医院是附带损害吗?评估2023年10月7日至11月17日加沙地带2000磅炸弹爆炸点与医院设施的地理空间距离。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 10;4(10):e0003178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003178. eCollection 2024.
6
Excess deaths in Gaza.加沙地带的超额死亡人数。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Sep;12(9):e1395. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00267-5.
7
A retrospective study of the predictors of mortality among patients in intensive care units at North West-Bank hospitals in Palestine.对巴勒斯坦西北岸医院重症监护病房患者死亡率预测因素的回顾性研究。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2024 Aug;52(3):105-112. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2024.2359363. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Civilian mortality and damage to medical facilities in Gaza.加沙地带平民的死亡率以及医疗设施遭受的破坏。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 16;9(5):e014756. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014756.
9
Patients in Gaza with chronic conditions need urgent interventions.加沙患有慢性病的患者急需干预措施。
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1847-1848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00705-0. Epub 2024 May 1.
10
'Nowhere and no one is safe': spatial analysis of damage to critical civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip during the first phase of the Israeli military campaign, 7 October to 22 November 2023.“无处安全,无人幸免”:对2023年10月7日至11月22日以色列军事行动第一阶段加沙地带关键民用基础设施受损情况的空间分析
Confl Health. 2024 Apr 2;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00580-x.