Suppr超能文献

接受直接口服抗凝剂和华法林的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的出血风险:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

Bleeding Risk in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

作者信息

Wang Yimin Pearl, Kehar Rohan, Iansavitchene Alla, Lazo-Langner Alejandro

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Library Services, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

TH Open. 2020 Jul 13;4(3):e145-e152. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714918. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

In randomized trials in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a lower risk of bleeding compared with warfarin. However, data from randomized trials may not extrapolate to general population. We aimed to determine the risk of bleeding in patients on DOACs in observational studies.  Observational studies from 1990 to January 2019 were included. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated with a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous anticoagulants exposure, study type, funding source, and DOAC type (direct thrombin inhibitors vs. factor Xa inhibitors) were conducted.  A total of 35 studies comprising 2,356,201 patients were included. The average pooled HR for observational data was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71, 0.85). There were no statistically significant differences in pooled HR by previous exposure to anticoagulants, DOAC type (direct thrombin vs. factor Xa inhibitors), study type, and funding source. Among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, patients on apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding compared with warfarin (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50, 0.71,  < 0.001) in contrast to those on rivaroxaban (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91, 1.06,  = 0.60).  In observational studies, AF patients on DOACs experience less bleeding events compared with warfarin; however, apixaban and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban, have a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin.

摘要

在心房颤动(AF)患者中,接受直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)治疗的患者相比华法林出血风险更低。然而,随机试验的数据可能无法外推至普通人群。我们旨在通过观察性研究确定接受DOACs治疗的患者的出血风险。

纳入了1990年至2019年1月的观察性研究。使用通用逆方差法的随机效应模型计算合并效应风险比(HR)。根据既往抗凝剂暴露情况、研究类型、资金来源和DOAC类型(直接凝血酶抑制剂与Xa因子抑制剂)进行亚组分析。

共纳入35项研究,涉及2356201例患者。观察性数据的平均合并HR为0.78(95%置信区间[CI] 0.71,0.85)。既往抗凝剂暴露情况、DOAC类型(直接凝血酶与Xa因子抑制剂)、研究类型和资金来源在合并HR方面无统计学显著差异。在接受Xa因子抑制剂治疗的患者中,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班治疗的患者出血风险更低(HR 0.60,95% CI 0.50,0.71,<0.001),而利伐沙班治疗的患者则不然(HR 0.98,95% CI 0.91,1.06,P = 0.60)。

在观察性研究中,与华法林相比,接受DOACs治疗的AF患者出血事件较少;然而,阿哌沙班和达比加群,而非利伐沙班,出血风险低于华法林。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0296/7358046/ed63920632cd/10-1055-s-0040-1714918-i200010-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验