Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 2;189(11):1238-1243. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa148.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic revealed and exacerbated existing social and economic health disparities, and actionable epidemiologic evidence is needed to identify potential vulnerability factors to help inform targeted responses. In this commentary, methodological challenges and opportunities regarding the links between air pollution and COVID-19 are discussed with a focus on 2 factors: 1) the role of differential exposure to air pollution across populations as an explanation for spatiotemporal variability of the epidemic spread and resultant mortality; and 2) the indirect impacts of interventions to control COVID-19 person-to-person spread treated as natural experiments on air pollution and population health. I first discuss the potential mechanisms between exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 and the opportunity to clearly formulate causal questions of interest through the target trial framework. Then, I discuss challenges regarding the use of quasiexperimental designs that capitalize on the differential timing of COVID-19 policies including the selection of control groups and potential violations of the common shock assumption. Finally, I discuss environmental justice implications of this many-headed beast of a crisis.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行揭示并加剧了现有的社会和经济健康差距,需要有可操作的流行病学证据来确定潜在的脆弱性因素,以帮助制定有针对性的应对措施。在这篇评论中,重点讨论了空气污染与 COVID-19 之间联系的方法学挑战和机遇,主要有两个因素:1) 由于人口对空气污染的差异暴露,造成传染病传播和由此产生的死亡率的时空变化,这可作为一种解释;2) 作为自然实验,控制 COVID-19 人际传播的干预措施对空气污染和人口健康的间接影响。我首先讨论了暴露于空气污染和 COVID-19 之间的潜在机制,以及通过目标试验框架明确阐述感兴趣的因果问题的机会。然后,我讨论了利用 COVID-19 政策的不同时间安排(包括选择对照组和潜在违反共同冲击假设)来利用准实验设计的挑战。最后,我讨论了这场多方面危机的环境正义影响。