Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
University of Porto, Portugal.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 15;272:111083. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Assessing management effectiveness in protected areas is a fundamental instrument to achieve socio-biodiversity protection goals. This study aimed to analyze the management effectiveness of Cunhambebe State Park (from now on, "PEC") in the State of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, from the perception of stakeholders and the multi-temporal analysis of land use and land cover between 1998 and 2018. We used the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management method for a participatory approach. Seventy-two indicators were used and applied to assess the perception of stakeholders related to the Advisory Council. The management effectiveness of PEC was classified as moderately satisfactory (63.41%). Indicators of "Legal security", "Vulnerability", "Site design and planning" and "Financial resources" revealed the weaknesses and threats of management and what should be the priority projects for better effectiveness. Through the multi-temporal analysis, we identified that the advances of pasture and urban areas are the highest pressures and threats, as perceived by stakeholders. In our case study, we provide evidence of actions that must be performed by the PEC management team. These actions must consider the weaknesses and threats presented by the SWOT analysis. Finally, we recommend some political and management measures: 1) Financial resources for the land regularization of areas overlapping with PEC, 2) Guidelines about PEC areas must be included in the Master Plans of municipalities that cover PEC limits, 3) Technical assistance to improve land management, and 4) Strengthen environmental education initiatives at all school levels.
评估保护区的管理成效是实现社会-生物多样性保护目标的基本手段。本研究旨在分析巴西里约热内卢州 Cunhambebe 州立公园(以下简称“PEC”)的管理成效,该分析基于利益相关者的感知以及 1998 年至 2018 年间土地利用和土地覆盖的多时相分析。我们采用了快速评估和优先排序保护区管理方法来进行参与式评估。研究使用了 72 项指标来评估与咨询委员会相关的利益相关者的感知。PEC 的管理成效被归类为中等满意(63.41%)。“法律保障”“脆弱性”“场地设计和规划”和“财政资源”等指标揭示了管理中的弱点和威胁,以及应优先考虑哪些项目以提高管理成效。通过多时相分析,我们确定了牧场和城市地区的扩张是利益相关者感知到的最高压力和威胁。在我们的案例研究中,我们提供了 PEC 管理团队必须采取行动的证据。这些行动必须考虑 SWOT 分析中提出的弱点和威胁。最后,我们建议采取一些政治和管理措施:1)为与 PEC 重叠的区域的土地合法化提供财政资源;2)覆盖 PEC 边界的城市的总体规划必须纳入关于 PEC 区域的准则;3)提供技术援助以改善土地管理;4)在各级学校加强环境教育举措。