• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对轻度智力障碍和边缘智力功能个体的物质使用的指示性预防计划的效果:一项准实验研究的结果。

The effectiveness of an indicated prevention programme for substance use in individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning: results of a quasi-experimental study.

机构信息

Research and Development, Pluryn, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):373-381. doi: 10.1111/add.15156. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1111/add.15156
PMID:32678489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891383/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the effectiveness of Take it personal!, a prevention programme for individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning (MID-BIF) and substance use (SU). The prevention programme aims to reduce SU (alcohol, cannabis and illicit drugs) among experimental to problematic substance users.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental design with two arms and a 3-month follow-up.

SETTING

Adolescents were recruited from 14 treatment centres in the Netherlands specialized in offering intra- and extramural care for people with MID-BIF and behavioural problems.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from 66 individuals with MID-BIF assigned either to the intervention condition (n = 34) or to the control condition (n = 32).

INTERVENTIONS

Take it personal! was designed to target four personality traits: sensation-seeking, impulsive behaviour, anxiety sensitivity and negative thinking. For each of these profiles, interventions were developed that were structurally the same but contained different personality-specific materials, games and exercises. The control group received care as usual.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes at 3-month follow-up were frequency of SU, severity of SU and binge drinking.

RESULTS

Results showed intervention effects for SU frequency (F  = 9.27, P = 0.004) and binge drinking (F  = 8.63, P = 0.005), but not for severity of SU (F  = 2.20, P = 0.145).

CONCLUSIONS

A prevention programme to reduce substance use among experimental to problematic users with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning helped participants to decrease substance use frequency and binge drinking.

摘要

目的

评估“个体化!”预防计划对轻度智力障碍和边缘智力功能(MID-BIF)以及物质使用(SU)个体的有效性。该预防计划旨在减少实验性至问题性物质使用者的 SU(酒精、大麻和非法药物)。

设计

具有两个臂的准实验设计和 3 个月的随访。

设置

从荷兰的 14 个治疗中心招募青少年,这些中心专门为 MID-BIF 和行为问题患者提供内外治疗。

参与者

从 66 名 MID-BIF 患者中收集数据,他们被分配到干预组(n=34)或对照组(n=32)。

干预措施

“个体化!”旨在针对四种人格特质:寻求刺激、冲动行为、焦虑敏感性和消极思维。针对这些特征,开发了结构相同但包含不同人格特定材料、游戏和练习的干预措施。对照组接受常规护理。

测量

3 个月随访时的主要结果是 SU 的频率、SU 的严重程度和 binge drinking。

结果

结果显示,SU 频率(F=9.27,P=0.004)和 binge drinking(F=8.63,P=0.005)方面存在干预效果,但 SU 严重程度(F=2.20,P=0.145)方面没有效果。

结论

针对轻度智力障碍和边缘智力功能的实验性至问题性物质使用者减少物质使用的预防计划有助于减少物质使用频率和 binge drinking。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7821/7891383/14d4d5780588/ADD-116-373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7821/7891383/3ffd89f351bc/ADD-116-373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7821/7891383/14d4d5780588/ADD-116-373-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7821/7891383/3ffd89f351bc/ADD-116-373-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7821/7891383/14d4d5780588/ADD-116-373-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of an indicated prevention programme for substance use in individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning: results of a quasi-experimental study.针对轻度智力障碍和边缘智力功能个体的物质使用的指示性预防计划的效果:一项准实验研究的结果。
Addiction. 2021 Feb;116(2):373-381. doi: 10.1111/add.15156. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
Take it personal! Development and modelling study of an indicated prevention programme for substance use in adolescents and young adults with mild intellectual disabilities and borderline intellectual functioning.将其个人化!为轻度智力残疾和边缘智力功能的青少年和年轻成年人制定的物质使用预防计划的制定和建模研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):307-315. doi: 10.1111/jar.12808. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Evaluating a selective prevention program for substance use and comorbid behavioral problems in adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.评估针对轻度至边缘性智力障碍青少年物质使用及共病行为问题的选择性预防项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 22;15:167. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0563-1.
4
Exploring the role of emotional and behavioral problems in a personality-targeted prevention program for substance use in adolescents and young adults with intellectual disability.探讨情绪和行为问题在针对智障青少年和年轻成人物质使用的人格定向预防计划中的作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Feb;109:103832. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103832. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
5
Personality dimensions and substance use in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.轻度至边缘性智力残疾个体的人格维度与物质使用情况
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Apr;63:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Substance use in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disability: A comparison between self-report, collateral-report and biomarker analysis.轻度至边缘性智力残疾个体的物质使用情况:自我报告、旁证报告与生物标志物分析的比较
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Apr;63:151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
7
The mediating role of substance use motives in the relationship between personality dimensions and alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults with mild intellectual disabilities.物质使用动机在人格维度与轻中度智力障碍青少年和年轻人的酒精和药物使用之间的关系中的中介作用。
Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;126:107173. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107173. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
8
Substance use among individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in residential care: Examining the relationship between drinking motives and substance use.在居住照料环境下,轻度智力障碍或边缘智力人群的物质使用:考察饮酒动机与物质使用之间的关系。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jul;32(4):871-878. doi: 10.1111/jar.12578. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Effectiveness of a selective intervention program targeting personality risk factors for alcohol misuse among young adolescents: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对青少年酒精滥用人格风险因素的选择性干预项目的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Addiction. 2015 Jul;110(7):1101-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12952.
10
The prevalence of personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients with borderline intellectual functioning: Comparison with outpatients from regular mental health care and outpatients with mild intellectual disabilities.边缘智力功能的精神科门诊患者中人格障碍的患病率:与常规精神卫生保健门诊患者及轻度智力残疾门诊患者的比较。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69(8):599-604. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1025836. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a personalized treatment for substance use disorder in people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A study protocol of a multiple baseline across individuals design.评估针对轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能人群的物质使用障碍个性化治疗:一项跨个体多基线设计的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 16;19:100616. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100616. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Substance use disorders in people with intellectual disability.智力残疾者的物质使用障碍。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;33(2):124-129. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000569.
2
A Systematic Review of Substance Use (Disorder) in Individuals with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability.轻度至边缘智力障碍个体的物质使用(障碍)的系统评价。
Eur Addict Res. 2019;25(6):263-282. doi: 10.1159/000501679. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
Universal cannabis outcomes from the Climate and Preventure (CAP) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
从气候与预防(CAP)研究看大麻的普遍影响:一项基于群组的随机对照试验。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Sep 25;13(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0171-4.
4
Intellectually disabled and addicted: a call for evidence based tailor-made interventions.智力残疾与成瘾:呼吁开展基于证据的量身定制干预措施。
Addiction. 2017 Nov;112(11):2067-2068. doi: 10.1111/add.13971. Epub 2017 Sep 3.
5
Personality-Targeted Interventions for Substance Use and Misuse.针对物质使用和滥用的个性化干预措施。
Curr Addict Rep. 2016;3(4):426-436. doi: 10.1007/s40429-016-0127-6. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
6
Personality dimensions and substance use in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.轻度至边缘性智力残疾个体的人格维度与物质使用情况
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Apr;63:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
The addicted brain: cognitive biases in problematic drinkers with mild to borderline intellectual disability.成瘾的大脑:轻度至边缘性智力残疾的问题饮酒者的认知偏差
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Mar;60(3):242-53. doi: 10.1111/jir.12244. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
8
Evaluating a selective prevention program for substance use and comorbid behavioral problems in adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.评估针对轻度至边缘性智力障碍青少年物质使用及共病行为问题的选择性预防项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 22;15:167. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0563-1.
9
Can cannabis use be prevented by targeting personality risk in schools? Twenty-four-month outcome of the adventure trial on cannabis use: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.针对学校中的人格风险能否预防大麻使用?大麻使用冒险试验的24个月结果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2015 Oct;110(10):1625-33. doi: 10.1111/add.12991. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Effectiveness of a selective intervention program targeting personality risk factors for alcohol misuse among young adolescents: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项针对青少年酒精滥用人格风险因素的选择性干预项目的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Addiction. 2015 Jul;110(7):1101-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12952.