Suppr超能文献

对两所本科培养、评估及反馈条件不同的医学院校形成性评估评价的比较。

Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.

作者信息

Schüttpelz-Brauns Katrin, Karay Yassin, Arias Johann, Gehlhar Kirsten, Zupanic Michaela

机构信息

Medical Faculty Mannheim at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc41. doi: 10.3205/zma001334. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Both formative and summative assessments have their place in medical curricula: formative assessment to accompany the learning process and summative assessment to ensure that minimum standards are achieved. Depending on the conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback, students place more or less importance on formative assessment, and thus the fulfilment of its function may be questionable. This study describes how the low-stakes formative Berlin Progress Test (BPT) is embedded at two medical faculties with partially different framework conditions and what effects these have on the students' testing efforts and the evaluation of the test, especially the perception of its benefits and (intangible) costs, such as non-participation in contemporaneous activities and emotional impairments. In this study, the proportion of non-serious BPT participants at two medical faculties (total sample: N=1,410, N=1,176) in winter term 2015/16 was determined both by the number of unanswered questions on the test itself and in a survey using a standardized instrument (N=415, N=234). Furthermore, open questions were asked in this survey about perceived benefits and perceived costs, which were analyzed with qualitative and quantitative methods. The BPT is generally better accepted at Faculty 2. This can be seen in the higher proportion of serious test takers, the lower perceived costs and the higher reported benefit, as well as the higher proportion of constructive comments. Faculty 2 students better understood the principle of formative testing and used the results of the BPT as feedback on their own knowledge progress, motivation to learn and reduction of exam fear. When medical faculties integrate formative assessments into the curriculum, they have to provide a framework in which these assessments are perceived as an important part of the curriculum. Otherwise, it is questionable whether they can fulfil their function of accompanying the learning process.

摘要

形成性评估和总结性评估在医学课程中都有各自的作用

形成性评估伴随学习过程,总结性评估确保达到最低标准。根据本科培训、评估和反馈的情况,学生对形成性评估的重视程度或多或少有所不同,因此其功能的实现可能存在疑问。本研究描述了低风险的形成性柏林进步测试(BPT)如何在两个框架条件部分不同的医学院实施,以及这些实施对学生的测试投入和测试评估有何影响,特别是对其益处和(无形)成本的认知,如不参与同期活动和情绪受损。在本研究中,通过测试本身未回答问题的数量以及使用标准化工具进行的一项调查(样本量分别为N = 415、N = 234),确定了2015/16冬季学期两个医学院(总样本量分别为N = 1,410、N = 1,176)中不认真参与BPT的学生比例。此外,该调查还设置了关于感知益处和感知成本的开放性问题,并采用定性和定量方法进行分析。总体而言,BPT在医学院2的接受度更高。这体现在认真应试者的比例更高、感知成本更低、报告的益处更高,以及建设性意见的比例更高。医学院2的学生更理解形成性测试的原则,并将BPT的结果用作自身知识进步、学习动力和考试恐惧减轻的反馈。当医学院将形成性评估纳入课程时,必须提供一个框架,使这些评估被视为课程的重要组成部分。否则,它们能否发挥伴随学习过程的功能就值得怀疑了。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de94/7346285/d4900da5a58f/JME-37-41-t-001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验