Suppr超能文献

一项针对使用共同设计方法与文化和语言多样化社区合作以改善或调整心理健康服务的范围综述。

A scoping review of the use of co-design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Vic., Australia.

School of Occupational Therapy, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13105. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

Abstract

Mental health services are increasingly encouraged to use co-design methodologies to engage individuals and families affected by mental health problems in service design and improvement. This scoping review aimed to identify research that used co-design methods with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) communities in mental health services, and to identify methodological considerations for working with this population. In October 2019, we searched five electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science) to identify papers published in which people from CALD backgrounds were engaged in the co-design of a mental health service or program. Searches were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English in the last 25 years (1993-2019). The search identified nine articles that matched the inclusion criteria. Using a scoping review methodology, the first author charted the data using extraction fields and then used qualitative synthesis methods to identify themes. Data were grouped into themes relevant to the research question. The two key themes relate first, to improving the experience for CALD communities when engaging in co-design research and second, to the development of co-design methods themselves. These findings support the need for further research into the transferability of co-design tools with CALD communities, particularly if co-design is to become a best practice method for service design and improvement. This scoping review identified methodological and practical consideration for researchers looking to use co-design with CALD communities for mental health service design, re-design or quality improvement initiatives. Further research is required to explore experiences of co-design methods, including documented protocols such as experience-based co-design, with CALD communities. This review indicates that explanatory models of mental health, community and co-design impact partnerships with CALD communities, and need to be understood to optimise the quality of these relationships when using co-design methods.

摘要

心理健康服务越来越鼓励采用共同设计方法,让受心理健康问题影响的个人和家庭参与服务设计和改进。本范围界定审查旨在确定使用共同设计方法与心理健康服务中的文化和语言多样化(CALD)社区合作的研究,并确定与该人群合作的方法学考虑因素。2019 年 10 月,我们搜索了五个电子数据库(CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Web of Science),以确定发表的论文,其中来自 CALD 背景的人参与了心理健康服务或计划的共同设计。搜索仅限于过去 25 年(1993-2019 年)以英文发表的同行评议文章。搜索确定了符合纳入标准的九篇文章。使用范围界定审查方法,第一作者使用提取字段对数据进行图表绘制,然后使用定性综合方法来确定主题。数据分为与研究问题相关的主题。两个关键主题首先涉及改善参与共同设计研究的 CALD 社区的体验,其次涉及共同设计方法本身的发展。这些发现支持需要进一步研究与 CALD 社区共同设计工具的可转移性,特别是如果共同设计要成为服务设计和改进的最佳实践方法。本范围界定审查确定了研究人员在使用共同设计为心理健康服务设计、重新设计或质量改进计划与 CALD 社区合作时需要考虑的方法和实践问题。需要进一步研究以探索共同设计方法的经验,包括经验为基础的共同设计等有文件记录的协议,与 CALD 社区合作。本综述表明,心理健康、社区和共同设计的解释模型影响与 CALD 社区的伙伴关系,需要加以理解,以优化使用共同设计方法时这些关系的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验