Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Perception in Action Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):2389-2402. doi: 10.1177/1747021820945604. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Eye movements provide important signals for joint attention. However, those eye movements that indicate bids for joint attention often occur among non-communicative eye movements. This study investigated the influence of these non-communicative eye movements on subsequent joint attention responsivity. Participants played an interactive game with an avatar which required both players to search for a visual target on a screen. The player who discovered the target used their eyes to initiate joint attention. We compared participants' saccadic reaction times (SRTs) to the avatar's joint attention bids when they were preceded by non-communicative eye movements that predicted the location of the target (Predictive Search), did not predict the location of the target (Random Search), and when there were no non-communicative eye gaze movements prior to joint attention (No Search). We also included a control condition in which participants completed the same task, but responded to a dynamic arrow stimulus instead of the avatar's eye movements. For both and conditions, participants had slower SRTs in Random Search trials than No Search and Predictive Search trials. However, these effects were smaller for eyes than for arrows. These data suggest that joint attention responsivity for eyes is relatively stable to the presence and predictability of spatial information conveyed by non-communicative gaze. Contrastingly, random sequences of dynamic arrows had a much more disruptive impact on subsequent responsivity compared with predictive arrow sequences. This may reflect specialised social mechanisms and expertise for selectively responding to communicative eye gaze cues during dynamic interactions, which is likely facilitated by the integration of ostensive eye contact cues.
眼球运动为共同注意提供了重要信号。然而,这些表示共同注意意图的眼球运动通常发生在非交流性眼球运动中。本研究调查了这些非交流性眼球运动对后续共同注意反应性的影响。参与者与一个化身玩互动游戏,该游戏要求两个玩家在屏幕上寻找一个视觉目标。发现目标的玩家会用眼睛来启动共同注意。我们比较了参与者在共同注意意图之前出现的非交流性眼球运动(预测性搜索)、未预测目标位置的非交流性眼球运动(随机搜索)和没有非交流性眼球注视运动(无搜索)时,对化身共同注意意图的眼球运动的眼跳反应时(SRT)。我们还包括一个对照条件,参与者在其中完成相同的任务,但响应的是动态箭头刺激,而不是化身的眼球运动。对于 和 条件,参与者在随机搜索试验中的 SRT 比无搜索和预测性搜索试验慢。然而,眼睛的这些效果比箭头的效果小。这些数据表明,对于眼睛的共同注意反应性,空间信息的存在和可预测性对视神经的非交流性注视相对稳定。相比之下,与预测性箭头序列相比,动态箭头的随机序列对后续反应性的干扰要大得多。这可能反映了专门的社会机制和专业知识,用于在动态交互过程中选择性地对交际性眼球注视线索做出反应,这可能得益于对有提示性的眼神接触线索的整合。