Amaral Marco Antonio, Dantas W G, Arenzon Jeferson J
Instituto de Humanidades, Artes e Ciências, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, CEP 45638-000 Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil.
Departamento de Ciências Exatas, EEIMVR, Universidade Federal Fluminense, CEP 27255-125, Volta Redonda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Phys Rev E. 2020 Jun;101(6-1):062418. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.062418.
Critical thinking and skepticism are fundamental mechanisms that one may use to prevent the spreading of rumors, fake news, and misinformation. We consider a simple model in which agents without previous contact with the rumor, being skeptically oriented, may convince spreaders to stop their activity or, once exposed to the rumor, decide not to propagate it as a consequence, for example, of fact checking. We extend a previous, mean-field analysis of the combined effect of these two mechanisms, active and passive skepticism, to include spatial correlations. This can be done either analytically, through the pair approximation, or simulating an agent-based version on diverse networks. Our results show that while in mean field there is no coexistence between spreaders and susceptibles (although, depending on the parameters, there may be bistability depending on the initial conditions), when spatial correlations are included, because of the protective effect of the isolation provided by removed agents, coexistence is possible.
批判性思维和怀疑态度是人们可用来防止谣言、假新闻和错误信息传播的基本机制。我们考虑一个简单模型,在该模型中,此前未接触过谣言且持怀疑态度的个体,可能会说服传播者停止传播行为,或者在接触到谣言后,例如通过事实核查,决定不再传播它。我们扩展了之前对这两种机制(主动怀疑和被动怀疑)综合效应的平均场分析,以纳入空间相关性。这可以通过解析方法,即通过对近似,或者在不同网络上模拟基于主体的版本来实现。我们的结果表明,虽然在平均场中传播者和易感者之间不存在共存(尽管根据参数不同,可能会因初始条件而存在双稳性),但当纳入空间相关性时,由于被移除个体所提供的隔离的保护作用,共存是可能的。