Ogino Tomoyuki, Kanata Yoshihiro, Uegaki Ryota, Yamaguchi Tatuya, Morisaki Katuhisa, Nakano Shuhei, Domen Kazuhisa
Department of Rehabilitation, Hyogo College of Medicine Sasayama Medical Center, Kurooka 5, Sasayama, Hyogo 669-2321, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104886. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104886. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether gait training using the Gait Exercise Assist Robot (GEAR) is more effective for improving gait ability than treadmill gait training in chronic stroke subjects.
Subjects were randomly assigned to either the GEAR group (n = 8) or treadmill group (n = 11). Both groups received a training program of 20 sessions (5 days/week). The 10-m walk test, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, 6-min walk test, the Medical Outcome Study 8-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and Global Rating of Change (GRC) scales were administered at baseline (week 0), completion of training (week 4), 1-mo follow-up (week 8), and 3-mo follow-up (week 16).
Gait speed was significantly increased at completion of training and 1-mo follow-up compared with baseline in the GEAR group. Mean changes in TUG and 6-min walk were significantly greater in the GEAR group than in the treadmill group at completion of training compared to baseline. Furthermore, GRC scales were significantly increased at completion of training, 1-mo follow-up, and 3-mo follow-up compared with baseline in the GEAR group.
This study suggests that gait training using GEAR was more effective for improving gait ability than treadmill among subjects with chronic stroke.
This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (No. UMIN000028042).
本研究旨在调查在慢性中风患者中,使用步态训练辅助机器人(GEAR)进行步态训练在改善步态能力方面是否比跑步机步态训练更有效。
将受试者随机分为GEAR组(n = 8)或跑步机组(n = 11)。两组均接受为期20节(每周5天)的训练计划。在基线(第0周)、训练结束时(第4周)、1个月随访(第8周)和3个月随访(第16周)时进行10米步行测试、计时起立行走测试(TUG)、6分钟步行测试、医学结局研究8项简短健康调查(SF - 8)以及总体变化评分(GRC)量表评估。
与基线相比,GEAR组在训练结束时和1个月随访时步态速度显著提高。与基线相比,在训练结束时,GEAR组的TUG和6分钟步行的平均变化显著大于跑步机组。此外,与基线相比,GEAR组在训练结束时、1个月随访和3个月随访时GRC量表显著增加。
本研究表明,在慢性中风患者中,使用GEAR进行步态训练在改善步态能力方面比跑步机训练更有效。
本研究已在大学医院医学信息网络注册(编号UMIN000028042)。