• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优势蜂种和花的丰度驱动植物-传粉者群落中寄生虫的时间动态。

Dominant bee species and floral abundance drive parasite temporal dynamics in plant-pollinator communities.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, UK.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;4(10):1358-1367. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1247-x. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1038/s41559-020-1247-x
PMID:32690902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7529964/
Abstract

Pollinator reductions can leave communities less diverse and potentially at increased risk of infectious diseases. Species-rich plant and bee communities have high species turnover, making the study of disease dynamics challenging. To address how temporal dynamics shape parasite prevalence in plant and bee communities, we screened >5,000 bees and flowers over an entire growing season for five common bee microparasites (Nosema ceranae, Nosema bombi, Crithidia bombi, Crithidia expoeki and neogregarines). Over 110 bee species and 89 flower species were screened, revealing that 42% of bee species (12.2% individual bees) and 70% of flower species (8.7% individual flowers) had at least one parasite in or on them, respectively. Some common flowers (for example, Lychnis flos-cuculi) harboured multiple parasite species whilst others (for example, Lythrum salicaria) had few. Significant temporal variation of parasite prevalence in bees was linked to bee diversity, bee and flower abundance and community composition. Specifically, we found that bee communities had the highest prevalence late in the season, when social bees (Bombus spp. and Apis mellifera) were dominant and bee diversity was lowest. Conversely, prevalence on flowers was lowest late in the season when floral abundance was highest. Thus turnover in the bee community impacted community-wide prevalence, and turnover in the plant community impacted when parasite transmission was likely to occur at flowers. These results imply that efforts to improve bee health will benefit from the promotion of high floral numbers to reduce transmission risk, maintaining bee diversity to dilute parasites and monitoring the abundance of dominant competent hosts.

摘要

传粉媒介减少会使群落的物种多样性降低,并且使群落更容易感染传染病。物种丰富的植物和蜜蜂群落具有较高的物种周转率,这使得疾病动态的研究具有挑战性。为了研究时间动态如何影响植物和蜜蜂群落中寄生虫的流行率,我们在整个生长季节中对超过 5000 只蜜蜂和花朵进行了筛选,以检测五种常见的蜜蜂微寄生虫(N. ceranae、N. bombi、C. bombi、C. expoeki 和新孢子虫)。共筛选了 110 多种蜜蜂和 89 种花卉,结果表明,42%的蜜蜂物种(12.2%的个体蜜蜂)和 70%的花卉物种(8.7%的个体花卉)分别携带至少一种寄生虫。一些常见的花(例如,繁缕)携带多种寄生虫,而另一些花(例如,千屈菜)携带的寄生虫较少。蜜蜂寄生虫流行率的显著时间变化与蜜蜂多样性、蜜蜂和花卉丰度以及群落组成有关。具体来说,我们发现蜜蜂群落的寄生虫流行率在季节后期最高,此时社会性蜜蜂(熊蜂属和西方蜜蜂)占优势,蜜蜂多样性最低。相反,当花卉丰度最高时,花卉上的寄生虫流行率在季节后期最低。因此,蜜蜂群落的周转率会影响整个群落的流行率,而植物群落的周转率会影响在花卉上发生寄生虫传播的时间。这些结果表明,为了改善蜜蜂的健康状况,需要促进花卉数量的增加以降低传播风险,保持蜜蜂多样性以稀释寄生虫,并监测优势宿主的丰度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/6811e7411372/nihms-1604165-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/300cdc4d8873/nihms-1604165-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/57078f2ec458/nihms-1604165-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/513e4a5aca23/nihms-1604165-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/6811e7411372/nihms-1604165-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/300cdc4d8873/nihms-1604165-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/57078f2ec458/nihms-1604165-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/513e4a5aca23/nihms-1604165-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be34/7529964/6811e7411372/nihms-1604165-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dominant bee species and floral abundance drive parasite temporal dynamics in plant-pollinator communities.优势蜂种和花的丰度驱动植物-传粉者群落中寄生虫的时间动态。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;4(10):1358-1367. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1247-x. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
2
Disease where you dine: plant species and floral traits associated with pathogen transmission in bumble bees.病从口入:与熊蜂病原体传播相关的植物物种和花部特征。
Ecology. 2018 Nov;99(11):2535-2545. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2503. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
3
Floral shape predicts bee-parasite transmission potential.花形预示着蜂类寄生虫的传播潜力。
Ecology. 2022 Jul;103(7):e3730. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3730. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
4
Bee pathogen transmission dynamics: deposition, persistence and acquisition on flowers.蜜蜂病原体传播动态:在花朵上的沉积、持久性和获得。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 May 29;286(1903):20190603. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0603.
5
Within-Colony Transmission of Microsporidian and Trypanosomatid Parasites in Honey Bee and Bumble Bee Colonies.蜂群内微孢子虫和原生动物寄生虫的传播。
Environ Entomol. 2020 Dec 14;49(6):1393-1401. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa112.
6
Eristalis flower flies can be mechanical vectors of the common trypanosome bee parasite, Crithidia bombi.Eristalis 花蝇可能是普通熊蜂寄生虫克里特西亚 bombi 的机械传播媒介。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 4;11(1):15852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95323-w.
7
Long-Term Temporal Trends of spp. Infection Prevalence in Northeast Germany: Continuous Spread of , an Emerging Pathogen of Honey Bees (), but No General Replacement of .德国东北部 spp. 感染率的长期时间趋势:蜜蜂新兴病原体 的持续传播,但 未被普遍取代。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jul 6;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00301. eCollection 2017.
8
Interspecific geographic distribution and variation of the pathogens Nosema bombi and Crithidia species in United States bumble bee populations.美国熊蜂种群中病原体Nosema bombi 和 Crithidia 种的种间地理分布和变异。
J Invertebr Pathol. 2012 Feb;109(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
9
Ecological and social factors influence interspecific pathogens occurrence among bees.生态和社会因素影响蜜蜂种间病原体的发生。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 1;14(1):5136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55718-x.
10
More is less: mass-flowering fruit tree crops dilute parasite transmission between bees.多则少:大量开花的果树作物会稀释蜜蜂之间寄生虫的传播。
Int J Parasitol. 2021 Aug;51(9):777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Friend or foe? Concentration of a commensal microbe induces distinct responses in developing honey bees exposed to field-realistic pesticide concentrations.敌友难辨?共生微生物的浓度在暴露于田间实际农药浓度的发育中的蜜蜂中引发不同反应。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2025 Aug 23;101(9). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaf080.
2
Beta Diversity of Tenebrionid Beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) in Ningxia Grasslands and Their Driving Factors.宁夏草原拟步甲(鞘翅目,拟步甲科)的β多样性及其驱动因素
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;14(6):680. doi: 10.3390/biology14060680.
3
Host ecology and phylogeny shape the temporal dynamics of social bee viromes.

本文引用的文献

1
Honey bees and wild pollinators differ in their preference for and use of introduced floral resources.蜜蜂和野生传粉者在对引入花卉资源的偏好和利用方面存在差异。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun 17;10(13):6741-6751. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6417. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Cross-infectivity of honey and bumble bee-associated parasites across three bee families.三种蜜蜂科中,蜜源和熊蜂共生寄生虫的交叉感染性。
Parasitology. 2020 Oct;147(12):1290-1304. doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001018. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant-pollinator networks.
宿主生态与系统发育塑造了群居蜜蜂病毒群落的时间动态。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 5;16(1):2207. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57314-7.
4
The trypanosomatid (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) parasites in bees: A review on their environmental circulation, impacts and implications.蜜蜂中的锥虫目(动质体纲:锥虫科)寄生虫:关于其环境传播、影响及意义的综述
Curr Res Insect Sci. 2025 Jan 21;7:100106. doi: 10.1016/j.cris.2025.100106. eCollection 2025.
5
Avoiding the tragedies of parasite tolerance in Darwinian beekeeping.避免达尔文式养蜂中寄生虫耐受性的悲剧。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Feb;292(2040):20242433. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2433. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Endosymbionts that threaten commercially raised and wild bumble bees ( spp.).威胁商业养殖和野生大黄蜂(物种)的内共生体。
J Pollinat Ecol. 2023 Feb 7;33:14-36. doi: 10.26786/1920-7603(2023)713.
7
Urbanization Shifts Immunometabolism in a Common Bumblebee.城市化改变了普通大黄蜂的免疫代谢。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e70743. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70743. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Species traits, landscape quality and floral resource overlap with honeybees determine virus transmission in plant-pollinator networks.物种特性、景观质量以及与蜜蜂的花卉资源重叠决定了植物-传粉者网络中的病毒传播。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec;8(12):2239-2251. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02555-w. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
9
Ecological and social factors influence interspecific pathogens occurrence among bees.生态和社会因素影响蜜蜂种间病原体的发生。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 1;14(1):5136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55718-x.
10
Identification of fungi isolated from commercial bumblebee colonies.从商业大黄蜂蜂群中分离出的真菌的鉴定。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 30;12:e16713. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16713. eCollection 2024.
景观简化塑造了植物-传粉者网络中病原体的流行程度。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Aug;23(8):1212-1222. doi: 10.1111/ele.13521. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
4
Why Are Queens Broodless? Failed Nest Initiation Not Linked to Parasites, Mating Status, or Ovary Development in Two Bumble Bee Species of Pyrobombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus).为什么蜂后不育?在两个 Pyrobombus(膜翅目:蜜蜂科:熊蜂属)物种中,未启动巢室的行为与寄生虫、交配状态或卵巢发育无关。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Apr 6;113(2):575-581. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz330.
5
Exposure of Larvae of the Solitary Bee to the Honey Bee Pathogen Affects Life History.独居蜂幼虫接触蜜蜂病原体影响生活史。
Insects. 2019 Oct 31;10(11):380. doi: 10.3390/insects10110380.
6
RNA virus spillover from managed honeybees (Apis mellifera) to wild bumblebees (Bombus spp.).经管理的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)向野生熊蜂(Bombus spp.)的 RNA 病毒溢出。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 26;14(6):e0217822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217822. eCollection 2019.
7
Trypanosomatid parasites infecting managed honeybees and wild solitary bees.感染饲养蜜蜂和野生独居蜜蜂的动基体原虫寄生虫。
Int J Parasitol. 2019 Jul;49(8):605-613. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
8
Trait-Based Modeling of Multihost Pathogen Transmission: Plant-Pollinator Networks.基于特征的多宿主病原体传播模型:植物-传粉者网络。
Am Nat. 2019 Jun;193(6):E149-E167. doi: 10.1086/702959. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Prevalence of infection by the microsporidian Nosema spp. in native bumblebees (Bombus spp.) in northern Thailand.在泰国北部,原生熊蜂(Bombus spp.)中微孢子虫属(Nosema spp.)的感染流行率。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213171. eCollection 2019.
10
Establishment of wildflower fields in poor quality landscapes enhances micro-parasite prevalence in wild bumble bees.在质量较差的景观中建立野花田会增加野生熊蜂体内微寄生虫的流行率。
Oecologia. 2019 Jan;189(1):149-158. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4296-y. Epub 2018 Nov 7.