• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精使用障碍中对后悔和失望的学习能力受损。

Impaired learning from regret and disappointment in alcohol use disorder.

机构信息

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 6, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68942-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-68942-y
PMID:32694573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7374698/
Abstract

The development of alcohol habits is considered a form of maladaptive reinforced learning, with sustained alcohol use resulting in the strengthening of associative links between consumption and either rewarding, or the lack of aversive, experiences. Despite recent efforts in characterizing decision-making skills in alcohol-use-disorder (AUD), it is still unknown whether impaired behavioural learning in AUD patients reflects a defective processing and anticipation of choice-related, cognitively mediated, emotions such as regret or relief for what might have been under a different choice. We administered a Wheel-of-Fortune (WoF) task to 26 AUD patients and 19 healthy controls, to investigate possible alterations in adjusting choices to the magnitude of experienced regret/relief, and in other facets of decision-making performance such as choice latency. AUD patients displayed both longer deliberation time than healthy controls, and impaired adaptations to previous outcome-related negative emotions. Although further evidence is needed to unveil the cognitive mechanisms underlying AUD patients' abnormal choice, the present results highlight important implications for the clinical practice, e.g. in terms of cognitive treatments aiming to shape faulty perceptions about negative emotions associated with excessive alcohol exposure.

摘要

酒精习惯的发展被认为是一种适应不良的强化学习形式,持续饮酒会导致消费与奖励或缺乏厌恶体验之间的关联加强。尽管最近在描述酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的决策技能方面做出了努力,但仍不清楚 AUD 患者的行为学习受损是否反映了对与选择相关的认知介导情绪(例如对可能做出不同选择的遗憾或解脱)的处理和预期存在缺陷。我们对 26 名 AUD 患者和 19 名健康对照者进行了轮盘赌任务(WoF),以研究对经历的遗憾/解脱的程度调整选择的可能性,以及在其他决策表现方面,例如选择潜伏期。AUD 患者的思考时间比健康对照组长,并且对先前与结果相关的负面情绪的适应能力受损。尽管需要进一步的证据来揭示 AUD 患者异常选择的认知机制,但目前的结果对临床实践具有重要意义,例如在旨在改变与过度饮酒相关的负面情绪的错误认知的认知治疗方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae98/7374698/a9a8e48d6007/41598_2020_68942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae98/7374698/0de013f45913/41598_2020_68942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae98/7374698/a9a8e48d6007/41598_2020_68942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae98/7374698/0de013f45913/41598_2020_68942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae98/7374698/a9a8e48d6007/41598_2020_68942_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impaired learning from regret and disappointment in alcohol use disorder.酒精使用障碍中对后悔和失望的学习能力受损。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68942-y.
2
Increased decision latency in alcohol use disorder reflects altered resting-state synchrony in the anterior salience network.酒精使用障碍中的决策时延长反映了前注意网络静息状态同步性的改变。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 1;11(1):19581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99211-1.
3
Multiple sclerosis decreases explicit counterfactual processing and risk taking in decision making.多发性硬化症会降低决策制定中的明确反事实处理和风险承担能力。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050718. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
4
Decreased information processing speed and decision-making performance in alcohol use disorder: combined neurostructural evidence from VBM and TBSS.酒精使用障碍患者的信息处理速度和决策表现下降:来自 VBM 和 TBSS 的联合神经结构证据。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Feb;15(1):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00248-8.
5
The alcoholic brain: neural bases of impaired reward-based decision-making in alcohol use disorders.酒精性大脑:酒精使用障碍中基于奖励的决策受损的神经基础。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Mar;39(3):423-435. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3205-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Decision-related loss: regret and disappointment.决策相关损失:后悔与失望。
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):2031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Counterfactually mediated emotions: a developmental study of regret and relief in a probabilistic gambling task.反事实中介情绪:概率赌博任务中后悔和宽慰的发展研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jun;112(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
8
Intracranial subsecond dopamine measurements during a "sure bet or gamble" decision-making task in patients with alcohol use disorder suggest diminished dopaminergic signals about relief.在酒精使用障碍患者进行“稳赢或赌博”决策任务期间进行的颅内亚秒级多巴胺测量表明,与缓解相关的多巴胺信号减弱。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Feb;54(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2022.11.FOCUS22614.
9
Regulation of Craving and Negative Emotion in Alcohol Use Disorder.酒精使用障碍中对渴求感和负性情绪的调节。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Feb;5(2):239-250. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
10
Learning to resist the urge: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial investigating alcohol-specific inhibition training in abstinent patients with alcohol use disorder.学会抵制冲动:一项双盲、随机对照试验,研究在酒精使用障碍的戒酒患者中进行的酒精特异性抑制训练。
Trials. 2019 Jul 5;20(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3505-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding, and courting in show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs.在梳理毛发、进食和求偶之间的行为选择表现出情境灵活性,而非绝对的需求等级。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 13:2025.05.09.653186. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.653186.
2
Risky Decision-Making in Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder-A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review.酒精使用障碍成年人的风险决策——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2943. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082943.
3
Intracranial subsecond dopamine measurements during a "sure bet or gamble" decision-making task in patients with alcohol use disorder suggest diminished dopaminergic signals about relief.

本文引用的文献

1
Decreased information processing speed and decision-making performance in alcohol use disorder: combined neurostructural evidence from VBM and TBSS.酒精使用障碍患者的信息处理速度和决策表现下降:来自 VBM 和 TBSS 的联合神经结构证据。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Feb;15(1):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00248-8.
2
Executive Impairment in Alcohol Use Disorder Reflects Structural Changes in Large-Scale Brain Networks: A Joint Independent Component Analysis on Gray-Matter and White-Matter Features.酒精使用障碍中的执行功能损害反映了大规模脑网络的结构变化:基于灰质和白质特征的联合独立成分分析
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 26;10:2479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02479. eCollection 2019.
3
在酒精使用障碍患者进行“稳赢或赌博”决策任务期间进行的颅内亚秒级多巴胺测量表明,与缓解相关的多巴胺信号减弱。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Feb;54(2):E3. doi: 10.3171/2022.11.FOCUS22614.
4
Functional Coherence in Intrinsic Frontal Executive Networks Predicts Cognitive Impairments in Alcohol Use Disorder.额叶内在执行网络中的功能连贯性可预测酒精使用障碍中的认知障碍。
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 26;13(1):45. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13010045.
Microstructural damage of white-matter tracts connecting large-scale networks is related to impaired executive profile in alcohol use disorder.
白质束的微观结构损伤与连接大规模网络的执行功能障碍有关在酒精使用障碍。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;25:102141. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102141. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Abnormal fronto-striatal intrinsic connectivity reflects executive dysfunction in alcohol use disorders.异常的额-纹状体固有连接反映了酒精使用障碍中的执行功能障碍。
Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:27-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Salience network structural integrity predicts executive impairment in alcohol use disorders.突显网络结构完整性可预测酒精使用障碍的执行功能损伤。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 27;8(1):14481. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32828-x.
6
The alcoholic brain: neural bases of impaired reward-based decision-making in alcohol use disorders.酒精性大脑:酒精使用障碍中基于奖励的决策受损的神经基础。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Mar;39(3):423-435. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3205-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Cognitive Processing Speed across the Lifespan: Beyond the Influence of Motor Speed.一生中的认知处理速度:超越运动速度的影响。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Mar 22;9:62. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00062. eCollection 2017.
8
Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction.成瘾障碍中的决策功能障碍阶段。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018 Jan;164:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder.三思而后行:强迫症中的冲动性与决策制定
J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):263-72. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.039.
10
Counterfactual Thought.反事实思维。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:135-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249. Epub 2015 Sep 14.