Person-centred data collection methods to embed the authentic voice of people who experience health challenges.
作者信息
Prior Sarah Jane, Mather Carey, Ford Karen, Bywaters Danielle, Campbell Steven
机构信息
Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Cradle Coast Campus, Tasmania, Australia
School of Nursing, University of Tasmania, Newnham Campus, Tasmania, Australia.
出版信息
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000912.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Person-centred data collection methods to embed the authentic voice of people who experience health challenges.以个人为中心的数据收集方法，以融入经历健康挑战者的真实声音。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000912.
2
Patient experience of care in the safety net: current efforts and challenges.安全网中患者的就医体验：当前的努力与挑战。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Apr-Jun;35(2):138-48. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31824a58e9.
3
Lifelines: a life history methodology.生命线：一种生命史研究方法。
Nurs Res. 2004 May-Jun;53(3):207-10. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200405000-00008.
4
Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.焦点小组访谈：姑息治疗研究人员和临床医生指南
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003 May;9(5):202-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.5.11490.
5
Qualitative methods in arthritis research: overview and data collection.关节炎研究中的定性方法：概述与数据收集
Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Aug;10(4):273-81. doi: 10.1002/art.1790100409.
6
Quadangulation: A New Methodology Combining Ethnographic Research and Quality Improvement Projects in Health Science Research.四方定位法：一种将人种学研究与卫生科学研究中的质量改进项目相结合的新方法。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):273-278. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Qualitative research proposals--part III: sampling and data collection.定性研究计划书——第三部分：抽样与数据收集
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;34(3):242-4. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000270816.99318.3b.
8
Developing family-centred care in a neonatal intensive care unit: An action research study.在新生儿重症监护病房中开展以家庭为中心的护理：一项行动研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Feb;50:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
9
The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.学习曲线：使用焦点小组作为数据收集方法的优缺点。
Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79-88. doi: 10.7748/nr2004.07.11.4.79.c6217.
10
Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography.定性研究方法：人种志。
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a1020. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1020.
引用本文的文献
1
Supporting health and social care professionals in serious illness conversations: Development, validation, and preliminary evaluation of an educational booklet.支持卫生和社会保健专业人员进行重病沟通：教育手册的开发、验证和初步评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304180. eCollection 2024.
2
Torture survivors' experiences of receiving surgical treatment indicating re- traumatization.酷刑幸存者接受手术治疗的经历表明再次受到创伤。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 17;18(10):e0287994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287994. eCollection 2023.
3
Chemical restraint as behavioural euthanasia: case studies from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety.化学约束作为行为安乐死：皇家老年护理质量和安全委员会的案例研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04116-5.
4
Measuring with quality: the example of person-centred care.用质量来衡量：以以人中心的护理为例。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Apr;27(2):151-156. doi: 10.1177/13558196211054278. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation.发展新方法，以实现以人为中心的方法，对现实主义评价中的情境-机制-结果配置进行裁决。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042370.
6
'What is the risk to me from COVID-19?': Public involvement in providing mortality risk information for people with 'high-risk' conditions for COVID-19 (OurRisk.CoV).“感染 COVID-19 的风险有多大？”：公众参与为 COVID-19“高危”人群提供死亡率风险信息（OurRisk.CoV）。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Nov;21(6):e620-e628. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0386.
本文引用的文献
1
Co-design of a patient experience survey for arthritis central intake: an example of meaningful patient engagement in healthcare design.关节炎中心接待患者体验调查问卷的共同设计：患者有意义地参与医疗保健设计的一个实例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4196-9.
2
Computer-Mediated Communication to Facilitate Synchronous Online Focus Group Discussions: Feasibility Study for Qualitative HIV Research Among Transgender Women Across the United States.通过计算机媒介通信促进同步在线焦点小组讨论：美国跨性别女性定性艾滋病病毒研究的可行性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 29;21(3):e12569. doi: 10.2196/12569.
3
The impact of status and social context on health service co-design: an example from a collaborative improvement initiative in UK primary care.地位和社会背景对医疗服务共同设计的影响：来自英国初级保健合作改善计划的一个例子。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0608-5.
4
Co-design for implementing patient participation in hospital services: A discussion paper.关于在医院服务中实现患者参与的协同设计：一篇讨论文件。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jul;101(7):1302-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
Auto-driven Photo Elicitation Interviews in Research with Children: Ethical and Practical Considerations.儿童研究中的自动驱动照片引发式访谈：伦理与实践考量
Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2017 Jun;40(2):111-125. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2016.1273977. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
6
Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Focus Group Moderators.健康研究中焦点小组的方法学问题：对焦点小组主持人进行定性访谈的结果
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 Mar 14;3:2333393616630466. doi: 10.1177/2333393616630466. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
7
Distrust and patients in intercultural healthcare: A qualitative interview study.不信任与跨文化医疗保健中的患者：一项定性访谈研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 May;25(3):313-323. doi: 10.1177/0969733016652449. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Defining 'quality' from the patient's perspective: findings from focus groups with Medicaid beneficiaries and implications for public reporting.从患者角度定义“质量”：与医疗补助受益者焦点小组讨论的结果及对公开报告的启示
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):395-406. doi: 10.1111/hex.12466. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
Researching Reflexively With Patients and Families: Two Studies Using Video-Reflexive Ethnography to Collaborate With Patients and Families in Patient Safety Research.与患者及家属进行反思性研究：两项运用视频反思民族志法在患者安全研究中与患者及家属合作的研究。
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jun;26(7):979-93. doi: 10.1177/1049732315618937. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?医疗保健公民陪审团中的消费者声音重要吗？
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Zotero 插件