Suppr超能文献

评估1型糖尿病年轻患者的胰岛素自我注射偏好及依从性水平:两种胰岛素笔针长度的应用经验

Evaluating the User Preference and Level of Insulin Self-Administration Adherence in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Experience With Two Insulin Pen Needle Lengths.

作者信息

Al Hayek Ayman A, Al Dawish Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Diabetes Treatment Center, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Jun 17;12(6):e8673. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8673.

Abstract

Background Selecting the appropriate insulin pen needle is important to reduce pain and injection-related adverse events like insulin leakage. It also helps to improve medication adherence and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Objective This study aimed to compare the 6-mm and 8-mm 32.5-gauge insulin pen needles in terms of glycemic control, pain score, user preference, medication adherence, and injection adverse events in patients with T1DM. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of 62 patients with T1DM. All patients constituted an experimental group initially and then changed the length of the needle to be part of a self-control group. The glycemic control, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) score, needle attribute score, and injection-related adverse events were measured for all patients with both lengths of needles. Patients were assessed at the baseline visit and followed up for three months. Statistical comparisons were done by the chi-squared test, paired t-test, and paired Wilcoxon test when appropriate with a two-tailed alpha level below 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results With the NanoPass® 32.5-gauge, 6-mm needle (Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan), patients had significantly lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to 8-mm needles (7.9% vs. 8.3%; p<0.001). The proportions of patients who reported no hypoglycemic episodes were 22/62 and 9/62, with the 6-mm and 8-mm needles, respectively. The 6-mm needles were better in terms of the following parameters compared to 8-mm needles: mean needle attribute scores (36.7 vs. 24.2; p<0.001), median VAS pain scores (20 vs. 55; p<0.001), insulin leakage (6/62 vs. 20/62; p=0.002), and the MMAS score (4.9 vs. 3.4; p<0.001). Conclusion This study provided an overview of the safety, adherence, pain score, and glycemic control relating to the 6-mm and 8-mm insulin needle lengths. Insulin injections using the NanoPass 32.5-gauge, 6-mm needle were associated with lower pain score, higher patient adherence, fewer adverse events, and better glycemic control compared to the 8-mm needle. Therefore, we recommend the use of the NanoPass 6-mm needle for patients with T1DM. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

摘要

背景

选择合适的胰岛素笔用针头对于减轻疼痛和减少胰岛素渗漏等注射相关不良事件至关重要。这也有助于提高1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的药物依从性和血糖控制水平。目的:本研究旨在比较6毫米和8毫米、32.5规格的胰岛素笔用针头在T1DM患者的血糖控制、疼痛评分、用户偏好、药物依从性和注射不良事件方面的差异。方法:我们对62例T1DM患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。所有患者最初构成一个实验组,然后改变针头长度成为自身对照的一部分。对所有患者使用两种长度针头时的血糖控制、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、Morisky药物依从性量表(MMAS)评分、针头属性评分和注射相关不良事件进行测量。在基线访视时对患者进行评估,并随访三个月。在适当情况下,采用卡方检验、配对t检验和配对Wilcoxon检验进行统计学比较,双侧α水平低于0.05表示具有统计学意义。结果:使用日本东京泰尔茂公司生产的NanoPass® 32.5规格6毫米针头时,患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)显著低于使用8毫米针头时(7.9%对8.3%;p<0.001)。报告无低血糖发作的患者比例,使用6毫米针头时为22/62,使用8毫米针头时为9/62。与8毫米针头相比,6毫米针头在以下参数方面表现更好:平均针头属性评分(36.7对24.2;p<0.001)、VAS疼痛评分中位数(20对55;p<0.001)、胰岛素渗漏(6/62对20/62;p=0.002)以及MMAS评分(4.9对3.4;p<0.001)。结论:本研究概述了与6毫米和8毫米胰岛素针头长度相关的安全性、依从性、疼痛评分和血糖控制情况。与8毫米针头相比,使用NanoPass 32.5规格6毫米针头进行胰岛素注射时疼痛评分更低;患者依从性更高;不良事件更少;血糖控制更好。因此,我们建议T1DM患者使用NanoPass 6毫米针头。需要进一步研究以在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9603/7370678/cca93e908714/cureus-0012-00000008673-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验