Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚一家私立医院晚期癌症患者的随机对照试验及尊严疗法对生活质量的影响。

Randomized control trial of advanced cancer patients at a private hospital in Kenya and the impact of dignity therapy on quality of life.

机构信息

Palliative care, AKUHN, Nairobi, Kenya.

MMED INT. Med, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 23;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00614-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care is a modality of treatment that addresses physical, psychological and spiritual symptoms. Dignity therapy, a form of psychotherapy, was developed by Professor Harvey Chochinov, MD in 2005.The aim of the study was to assess the effect of one session of dignity therapy on quality of life in advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a randomized control trial of 144 patients (72 in each arm) randomized into group 1 (intervention arm) and group 2 (control arm). Baseline ESAS scores were determined in both arms following which group 1 received Dignity therapy while Group 2 received usual care only. Data collected was presented as printed (Legacy) documents to group 1 participants. These documents were a summary of previous discussions held. Post intervention ESAS scores were obtained in both groups after 6 weeks. Analysis was based on the intention to treat principle and descriptive statistics computed. The main outcome was symptom distress scores on the ESAS (summated out of 100 and symptom specific scores out of 10). The student T-test was used to test for difference in ESAS scores at follow up and graphs were computed for common cancers and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of the 144 (72 patients in each arm) patients randomized, 70%were female while 30% were male with a mean age of 50 years. At 6 weeks, 11 patients were lost to follow up, seven died and 126 completed the study. The commonly encountered cancers were gastrointestinal cancers (43%, p = 0.29), breast cancer (27.27% p = 0.71) and gynaecologic cancers (23% p = 0.35). Majority of the patients i.e. 64.3% had no comorbidities. The primary analysis results showed higher scores for the DT group (change in mean = 1.57) compared to the UC group (change in mean = - 0.74) yielding a non-statistically significant difference in change scores of 1.44 (p = 0.670; 95% CI - 5.20 to 8.06). After adjusting for baseline scores, the mean (summated) symptom distress score was not significant (GLM p = 0.78). Dignity therapy group showed a trend towards statistical improvement in anxiety (p = 0.059). The largest effects seen were in improvement of appetite, lower anxiety and improved wellbeing (Cohen effect size 0.3, 0.5 and 0.31 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dignity therapy showed no statistical improvement in overall quality of life. Symptom improvement was seen in anxiety and this was a trend towards statistical significance (p = 0.059).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number PACTR201604001447244 retrospectively registered with Pan African Clinical trials on 28th January 2016.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗是一种针对身体、心理和精神症状的治疗模式。尊严疗法是一种心理治疗形式,由 Harvey Chochinov 医学博士于 2005 年开发。本研究的目的是评估一次性尊严疗法对晚期癌症患者生活质量的影响。

方法

这是一项对 144 名患者(每组 72 名)进行的随机对照试验,将患者随机分为第 1 组(干预组)和第 2 组(对照组)。在两组均进行基线 ESAS 评分后,第 1 组接受尊严疗法,第 2 组仅接受常规护理。收集的数据以打印(传统)文件的形式呈现给第 1 组参与者。这些文件是之前讨论的摘要。在 6 周后,两组均获得干预后的 ESAS 评分。分析基于意向治疗原则,并进行描述性统计。主要结局是 ESAS(总分 100 分,症状特异性评分 10 分)上的症状困扰评分。学生 t 检验用于检验随访时 ESAS 评分的差异,并计算常见癌症和合并症的图表。

结果

在随机分配的 144 名患者(每组 72 名患者)中,70%为女性,30%为男性,平均年龄为 50 岁。在 6 周时,有 11 名患者失访,7 名死亡,126 名完成了研究。最常见的癌症是胃肠道癌症(43%,p=0.29)、乳腺癌(27.27%,p=0.71)和妇科癌症(23%,p=0.35)。大多数患者(即 64.3%)没有合并症。主要分析结果显示,DT 组的评分较高(平均变化为 1.57),而 UC 组的评分较低(平均变化为-0.74),变化评分的差异无统计学意义(1.44,p=0.670;95%CI-5.20 至 8.06)。调整基线评分后,平均(总和)症状困扰评分无显著性差异(GLM p=0.78)。尊严疗法组焦虑症状有改善的趋势(p=0.059)。最大的效果体现在改善食欲、降低焦虑和提高幸福感方面(Cohen 效应大小分别为 0.3、0.5 和 0.31)。

结论

尊严疗法在整体生活质量方面没有显示出统计学上的改善。在焦虑方面观察到症状改善,这是统计学意义上的趋势(p=0.059)。

试验注册

试验注册编号 PACTR201604001447244 于 2016 年 1 月 28 日在泛非临床试验中进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074d/7379366/2e632e098ba1/12904_2020_614_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验