Wild Martin
ETH Zurich, Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Clim Dyn. 2020;55(3):553-577. doi: 10.1007/s00382-020-05282-7. Epub 2020 May 25.
A plausible simulation of the global energy balance is a first-order requirement for a credible climate model. Here I investigate the representation of the global energy balance in 40 state-of-the-art global climate models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). In the CMIP6 multi-model mean, the magnitudes of the energy balance components are often in better agreement with recent reference estimates compared to earlier model generations on a global mean basis. However, the inter-model spread in the representation of many of the components remains substantial, often on the order of 10-20 Wm globally, except for aspects of the shortwave clear-sky budgets, which are now more consistently simulated by the CMIP6 models. The substantial inter-model spread in the simulated global mean latent heat fluxes in the CMIP6 models, exceeding 20% (18 Wm), further implies also large discrepancies in their representation of the global water balance. From a historic perspective of model development over the past decades, the largest adjustments in the magnitudes of the simulated present-day global mean energy balance components occurred in the shortwave atmospheric clear-sky absorption and the surface downward longwave radiation. Both components were gradually adjusted upwards over several model generations, on the order of 10 Wm, to reach 73 and 344 Wm, respectively in the CMIP6 multi-model means. Thereby, CMIP6 has become the first model generation that largely remediates long-standing model deficiencies related to an overestimation in surface downward shortwave and compensational underestimation in downward longwave radiation in its multi-model mean.
对全球能量平衡进行合理模拟是可信气候模型的首要要求。在此,我研究了参与耦合模式比较计划第6阶段(CMIP6)的40个先进全球气候模型中全球能量平衡的表现。在CMIP6多模式均值中,与早期模型相比,能量平衡各分量的大小在全球平均基础上往往与近期参考估计值更吻合。然而,许多分量表现的模式间差异仍然很大,全球范围内通常在10 - 20 W/m²量级,除了短波晴空辐射收支的某些方面,CMIP6模型现在对其模拟更为一致。CMIP6模型中模拟的全球平均潜热通量的模式间差异很大,超过20%(18 W/m²),这也进一步意味着它们在全球水平衡表现上存在很大差异。从过去几十年模型发展的历史角度来看,模拟的当前全球平均能量平衡各分量大小的最大调整发生在短波大气晴空吸收和地表向下长波辐射方面。在几代模型中,这两个分量都逐渐向上调整了约10 W/m²,在CMIP6多模式均值中分别达到73和344 W/m²。因此,CMIP6成为第一代在多模式均值中基本纠正了与地表向下短波辐射高估和向下长波辐射补偿性低估相关的长期模型缺陷的模型。