Reiners J N, Held J E, Wright C L, Qiao Q, Djira G D, Brunsvig B R, Reza K M, Brake D W
Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007.
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007.
Transl Anim Sci. 2017 Sep 1;1(3):311-319. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0037. eCollection 2017 Sep.
We conducted 2 experiments to determine lysine bioavailability from 2 lipid-coated lysine products. In an in vitro experiment we mixed each lipid-coated lysine product with either alfalfa- or corn-silage at different amounts of acidity. Scanning electron micrographs indicated that surface structure of each lipid-coated lysine particle was eroded after mixing with silage. Additionally, visual evaluation of scanning electron micrographs suggested that peripheral surface abrasion of lipid-coated lysine may be greater when lipid-coated lysine was mixed with alfalfa silage in comparison to corn silage. In a corresponding experiment, in vivo measures of lysine bioavailability to sheep from 2 lipid-coated lysine products and lysine-HCl were determined after mixing in corn silage. Plasma lysine concentrations increased linearly ( < 0.01) in response to abomasal lysine infusion indicating that our model was sensitive to increases in metabolizable lysine flow. Bioavailability of each lipid-coated lysine source and dietary lysine-HCl were calculated to be 23, 15, and 18%, respectively. Even though each dietary source of lysine increased plasma lysine, rates of increases in plasma lysine from one lipid-coated lysine source (linear; = 0.20) and lysine-HCl (linear; = 0.11) were not different from plasma lysine levels supported by diet alone. However, the rate of plasma lysine increase in response to lysine from the other lipid-coated lysine source was greater ( = 0.04) than plasma lysine from feed alone. Nonetheless, the rate of plasma lysine increase in response to lipid-coated lysine did not differ ( ≥ 0.70) from the rate of plasma lysine increase from lysine-HCl. Clearly, methods of manufacture, together with physical and chemical characteristics of diet, can impact amounts of metabolizable lysine provided from lipid-coated lysine products. Direct measures of lysine bioavailability from lipid-coated lysine products after mixing with diets should be based on measurements with the products treated similarly to the method of feeding.
我们进行了两项实验,以测定两种脂质包被赖氨酸产品中赖氨酸的生物利用率。在一项体外实验中,我们将每种脂质包被赖氨酸产品与不同酸度的苜蓿青贮料或玉米青贮料混合。扫描电子显微镜图像显示,与青贮料混合后,每个脂质包被赖氨酸颗粒的表面结构都受到了侵蚀。此外,对扫描电子显微镜图像的视觉评估表明,与玉米青贮料相比,脂质包被赖氨酸与苜蓿青贮料混合时,其外周表面磨损可能更大。在一项相应的实验中,在将两种脂质包被赖氨酸产品和盐酸赖氨酸与玉米青贮料混合后,测定了绵羊对其赖氨酸生物利用率的体内指标。随着皱胃赖氨酸输注,血浆赖氨酸浓度呈线性增加(<0.01),这表明我们的模型对可代谢赖氨酸流量的增加很敏感。计算得出,每种脂质包被赖氨酸来源和日粮盐酸赖氨酸的生物利用率分别为23%、15%和18%。尽管每种日粮赖氨酸来源都能提高血浆赖氨酸水平,但来自一种脂质包被赖氨酸来源(线性;=0.20)和盐酸赖氨酸(线性;=0.11)的血浆赖氨酸增加速率与仅由日粮支持的血浆赖氨酸水平并无差异。然而,来自另一种脂质包被赖氨酸来源的赖氨酸引起的血浆赖氨酸增加速率(=0.04)高于仅由饲料引起的血浆赖氨酸增加速率。尽管如此,脂质包被赖氨酸引起的血浆赖氨酸增加速率与盐酸赖氨酸引起的血浆赖氨酸增加速率并无差异(≥0.70)。显然,制造方法以及日粮的物理和化学特性会影响脂质包被赖氨酸产品提供的可代谢赖氨酸量。与日粮混合后,脂质包被赖氨酸产品中赖氨酸生物利用率的直接测定应基于对产品进行与饲喂方法类似处理后的测量。