Center for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, 2nd floor, room 2059, Toronto, ON, Canada.
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M5S 1S2, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 24;20(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05541-7.
Recognizing the need for improved communication with patients at the point of hospital discharge, a group of clinicians, patients, and designers in Toronto, Canada collaborated to develop a standardized tool known as the Patient-Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS). Although quantitative results suggest PODS helps mitigate gaps in knowledge, a qualitative inquiry from the clinician and patient perspective of psychiatric hospital discharge using PODS has not been widely explored. Our aim was to explore clinicians' and patients' experiences with PODS.
We used a qualitative thematic analysis to explore clinicians' (n = 10) and patients' (n = 6) experiences with PODS. We used convenience sampling to identify and invite potential participants at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada to participate in semi-structured interviews between February 2019 and September 2019. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to develop descriptive themes.
Emerging themes from the data between clinicians and patients were both different and complementary. Clinicians described PODS using the concept of "goals of care." They relayed their experiences with PODS as a discrete event and emphasized its role in meeting their "goals of care" for discharge planning. Patients provided more of a "goals of life" perspective on recovery. They characterized PODS as only one facet of their recovery journey and not necessarily as a discrete or memorable event. Patients focused on their outcomes post-discharge and situated their experiences with PODS through its relation to their overall recovery.
PODS was experienced differently by clinicians and patients. Clinicians experienced PODS as helpful in orienting them to the fulfillment of goals of care. Patients did not experience PODS as a particularly memorable intervention. Due to the information advantage that clinicians have about PODS, it is not surprising that clinicians and patients experienced the PODS differently. This study expanded our understanding of hospital discharge from clinicians and patients perspectives, and suggests that there are additional areas that need improvement.
为了改善患者在出院时与医务人员的沟通,加拿大安大略省多伦多的一组临床医生、患者和设计师合作开发了一种标准化工具,称为患者导向的出院总结(PODS)。虽然定量研究结果表明 PODS 有助于缩小知识差距,但从临床医生和精神科患者的角度来看,使用 PODS 进行精神病院出院的定性研究尚未广泛开展。我们的目的是探讨临床医生和患者对 PODS 的体验。
我们使用定性主题分析来探讨临床医生(n=10)和患者(n=6)对 PODS 的体验。我们使用便利抽样在加拿大安大略省多伦多的成瘾与心理健康中心确定并邀请潜在参与者参加 2019 年 2 月至 2019 年 9 月之间的半结构化访谈。使用主题分析方法对数据进行分析,以开发描述性主题。
来自临床医生和患者的数据中的新兴主题既有不同之处,也有互补之处。临床医生使用“照护目标”的概念来描述 PODS。他们描述了 PODS 作为一个离散事件的经历,并强调了其在满足出院计划“照护目标”方面的作用。患者从“生活目标”的角度提供了更多的康复观点。他们将 PODS 描述为康复之旅的一个方面,而不一定是一个离散或令人难忘的事件。患者专注于出院后的结果,并将他们的 PODS 体验置于整体康复的背景下。
临床医生和患者对 PODS 的体验不同。临床医生体验到 PODS 有助于指导他们实现照护目标。患者并没有将 PODS 体验为一个特别难忘的干预措施。由于临床医生对 PODS 具有信息优势,因此他们和患者对 PODS 的体验不同并不奇怪。这项研究从临床医生和患者的角度扩展了我们对医院出院的理解,并表明还有其他需要改进的领域。