Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
ASVZ, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jan;34(1):65-76. doi: 10.1111/jar.12786. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
Based on self-reported social capital, different typologies of family networks of people with intellectual disabilities were examined. Associations between behavioural and emotional problems or well-being and typologies were investigated.
137 participants with mild intellectual disability were interviewed using the Family Network Method-Intellectual Disability to assess their emotionally supportive family relationships. Data on participants' well-being and behavioural and emotional problems were also gathered. Latent class analysis was used to identify family typologies based on social network measures.
Four distinguishable typologies were identified, two supportive and two less supportive. A small association was found with behavioural and emotional problems and one of the supportive typologies. Associations with constructs of well-being were found for both supportive and less supportive typologies.
A variety of family types were found, with implications for sensitive professional support.
基于自我报告的社会资本,研究了智障人士的不同类型家庭网络。调查了行为和情绪问题或幸福感与类型之间的关系。
使用家庭网络方法-智力残疾对 137 名轻度智力残疾参与者进行访谈,以评估他们情感支持的家庭关系。还收集了参与者的幸福感以及行为和情绪问题的数据。使用潜在类别分析根据社交网络措施确定家庭类型。
确定了四种可区分的类型,两种支持型和两种支持型较少的类型。发现与行为和情绪问题以及一种支持型类型存在较小的关联。与幸福感的构建均与支持型和支持型较少的类型相关。
发现了各种类型的家庭,这对敏感的专业支持具有启示意义。