• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断变化的医学教育现状:对《解剖学法案》改革的警钟。

Changing medical education scenario: a wakeup call for reforms in Anatomy Act.

作者信息

Lalwani Rekha, Kotgirwar Sheetal, Athavale Sunita Arvind

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, 462020, India.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00507-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-020-00507-0
PMID:32711534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7382862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomy Act provides legal ambit to medical educationists for the acquisition of cadavers. The changing medical education scenario, socio-demographic change, and ethical concerns have necessitated an urgent review of its legal and ethical framework. Suitable amendments addressing the current disparities and deficiencies are long overdue.

METHODS

Anatomy Act in India is a state Act, which ensures the provision of human bodies for medical education and research. The methodology included three components namely: Comparison of various Anatomy Acts clause by clause, Feedback from anatomists, and Formulation of comprehensive model Anatomy Act.

RESULTS

Various Acts studied showed discrepancies in the purpose of the Act, roles and duties of stakeholders, regulation for body donation, the procedure to handle unclaimed bodies, disposal of dissected bodies, etc. No Act defines a donor and neither addresses the issue of transport of anatomical material. Only ten states have a clause for body donation. Acts of only six states have been amended over the last 50 years. Three states denied having an Act. The whole exercise of review of Acts, extensive feedback received from end-users, and taking into account global good practices, culminated in drafting a comprehensive model Anatomy Act founded on ethical principles.

CONCLUSION

India, with the largest number of medical colleges, is not only at the forefront but also a hub of medical education in the Southeast Asia region. Legal reform can be a torchbearer to promote ethical and transparent practices for obtaining cadavers for other countries of the region with similar socio-demography and shall also motivate anatomic fraternity across the globe for critical analysis of their respective Anatomy Acts.

摘要

背景

《解剖学法案》为医学教育工作者获取尸体提供了法律范围。不断变化的医学教育场景、社会人口结构变化以及伦理问题使得迫切需要对其法律和伦理框架进行审查。早就应该进行适当的修正以解决当前的差异和不足。

方法

印度的《解剖学法案》是一项邦级法案,确保为医学教育和研究提供人体。该方法包括三个组成部分,即:逐条款比较各种《解剖学法案》、解剖学家的反馈以及制定全面的模范《解剖学法案》。

结果

所研究的各项法案在法案目的、利益相关者的角色和职责、尸体捐赠规定、处理无人认领尸体的程序、解剖后尸体的处置等方面存在差异。没有一项法案对捐赠者进行定义,也未涉及解剖材料的运输问题。只有十个邦有尸体捐赠条款。在过去50年里,只有六个邦的法案进行了修正。有三个邦否认有相关法案。对各项法案的全面审查、从最终用户那里收到的广泛反馈以及考虑到全球良好做法,最终起草了一项基于伦理原则的全面模范《解剖学法案》。

结论

印度拥有数量最多的医学院,不仅处于前沿位置,也是东南亚地区的医学教育中心。法律改革可以成为一个引领者,为该地区其他具有类似社会人口结构的国家推广获取尸体的伦理和透明做法,也将促使全球解剖学界对各自的《解剖学法案》进行批判性分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8327/7382862/ce04e59d2b67/12910_2020_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8327/7382862/ce04e59d2b67/12910_2020_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8327/7382862/ce04e59d2b67/12910_2020_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing medical education scenario: a wakeup call for reforms in Anatomy Act.不断变化的医学教育现状:对《解剖学法案》改革的警钟。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00507-0.
2
Making the Ethical Transition in South Africa: Acquiring Human Bodies for Training in Anatomy.南非的伦理转变:获取人体进行解剖学培训。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 May;12(3):264-271. doi: 10.1002/ase.1814. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Current status of cadaver sources in Turkey and a wake-up call for Turkish anatomists.土耳其尸体来源的现状与土耳其解剖学家的警钟
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Mar;11(2):155-165. doi: 10.1002/ase.1713. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Body donations today and tomorrow: What is best practice and why?遗体捐赠的今昔:何为最佳实践及原因何在?
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.22641. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
5
Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals' Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review.维护逝者权利并允许在解剖学教育与研究中使用尸体的法律框架:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58473. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Assessment of Ethical Compliance of Handling and Usage of the Human Body in Anatomical Facilities of Ethiopian Medical Schools.埃塞俄比亚医学院解剖设施中人体处理与使用的伦理合规性评估
Pragmat Obs Res. 2021 Jul 12;12:65-80. doi: 10.2147/POR.S321646. eCollection 2021.
7
Attitudes of Turkish anatomists toward cadaver donation.土耳其解剖学家对尸体捐赠的态度。
Clin Anat. 2004 Nov;17(8):677-81. doi: 10.1002/ca.20056.
8
The Law, Ethics and Body Donation: A Tale of Two Bequeathal Programs.法律、伦理与遗体捐献:两个遗赠项目的故事。
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Jul;13(4):512-519. doi: 10.1002/ase.1922. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
BODIES R US: Ethical Views on the Commercialization of the Dead in Medical Education and Research.《人体交易:医学教育和研究中对死者商业化的伦理观点》。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 May;12(3):317-325. doi: 10.1002/ase.1809. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Cadavers as teachers in medical education: knowledge is the ultimate gift of body donors.尸体作为医学教育中的教师:知识是遗体捐赠者的终极馈赠。
Singapore Med J. 2007 Mar;48(3):186-9; quiz 190.

引用本文的文献

1
The disposability and inclusion of Brown bodies.褐色小体的可弃置性与包含情况。
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2025 Jan;186(1):e25003. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.25003. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
2
Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals' Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review.维护逝者权利并允许在解剖学教育与研究中使用尸体的法律框架:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):e58473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58473. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Corpse identification in mass disasters and other violence: the ethical challenges of a humanitarian approach.

本文引用的文献

1
BODIES R US: Ethical Views on the Commercialization of the Dead in Medical Education and Research.《人体交易:医学教育和研究中对死者商业化的伦理观点》。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 May;12(3):317-325. doi: 10.1002/ase.1809. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Body donations today and tomorrow: What is best practice and why?遗体捐赠的今昔:何为最佳实践及原因何在?
Clin Anat. 2016 Jan;29(1):11-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.22641. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
3
Body donation in India: social awareness, willingness, and associated factors.印度人体捐献:社会意识、意愿及相关因素。
重大灾难及其他暴力事件中的尸体辨认:人道主义方法面临的伦理挑战。
Forensic Sci Res. 2023 Dec 20;9(1):owad048. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad048. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Cadaver Dissection Experience for First-Time Dissectors: a Hypothetical Three-Pronged Approach for Student Preparation.初次解剖者的尸体解剖体验:一种针对学生准备工作的假设性三管齐下方法。
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Nov 29;34(1):257-269. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01950-5. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
The bioethics of skeletal anatomy collections from India.印度骨骼解剖标本收藏的伦理问题。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 24;15(1):1692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45738-6.
6
Willingness toward post-mortem body donation to science at a Mexican university: an exploratory survey.墨西哥某大学对死后向科学捐献遗体意愿的探索性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00982-1.
7
Anatomy acts concerning body and organ donations across the globe: past, present and future with a special emphasis on the indian scenario.全球范围内关于身体和器官捐赠的解剖学法案:过去、现在与未来,特别强调印度的情况。
Anat Cell Biol. 2023 Mar 31;56(1):1-8. doi: 10.5115/acb.22.166. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
Assessment of Ethical Compliance of Handling and Usage of the Human Body in Anatomical Facilities of Ethiopian Medical Schools.埃塞俄比亚医学院解剖设施中人体处理与使用的伦理合规性评估
Pragmat Obs Res. 2021 Jul 12;12:65-80. doi: 10.2147/POR.S321646. eCollection 2021.
Anat Sci Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;5(2):83-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.1263. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
4
Anatomy's use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice.对无人认领尸体的解剖利用:反对继续依赖这种道德上有疑问的做法的理由。
Clin Anat. 2012 Mar;25(2):246-54. doi: 10.1002/ca.21223. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
History of the Events which led to the Passing of the British Anatomy Act, A.D. 1832.导致公元1832年《英国解剖法案》通过的事件历史
Can Med Assoc J. 1920 Mar;10(3):283-4.
6
Cadavers for anatomical dissection.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan-Mar;2(1):16-7. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2005.008.