一种将清醒事件与梦境报告相匹配的范式。
A Paradigm for Matching Waking Events Into Dream Reports.
作者信息
Wang JiaXi, He JingYu, Bin Ting, Ma HuiYing, Wan Jing, Li XinQuan, Feng XiaoLing, Shen HeYong
机构信息
School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01430. eCollection 2020.
In this study, participants recorded their waking events (Personal significant events, PSEs/Major concerns, MCs) and dream reports for 7 days. These events and dreams were paired by the same day (216 PSEs-dreams pairs and 215 MCs-dreams pairs). Then participants were instructed to both find similar features (characters, objects, locations, actions, emotions, and themes) of their events-dreams pairs and give a match score of their events-dreams pairs. Besides, we proposed a method for independent judges to match waking events into dreams (the external ratings). The rating standard of the external-ratings was to look for similar behaviors between events and dreams. Based on this rating standard, three independent judges were instructed to rate participants' events-dreams pairs. Firstly, we compared the two kinds of methods of self-ratings. Spearman correlations showed that the two methods were significantly correlated with each other. These results suggested that the sum of different kinds of similar features could be used to represent self-ratings reported of the degree of the correlation between a waking event and a dream. Regression correlations showed that for PSEs-dreams pairs, characters, actions, emotions, and themes were similar features that affected the degree of the correlation between an event and a dream of the same day, and for MCs-dreams pairs, characters, locations, emotions, and themes were similar features that affected the degree of the correlation between an event and a dream of the same day. These results suggested that different kinds of similar features had different influence on the self-ratings' evaluation for the degree of matching between waking event and dream. Secondly, we compared the rating results of the self-ratings and the rating results of the external-ratings. Spearman correlations showed that the results of the self-ratings were significantly correlated with the results of the external-ratings. So this study's method for the external ratings may be suitable for future studies. Besides, as the external ratings of this study can rate dream metaphors, we also made a short discussion on dream metaphors. Future studies can use the method to explore dream metaphors.
在本研究中，参与者记录了他们7天的清醒事件（个人重大事件、PSEs/主要担忧、MCs）和梦境报告。这些事件和梦境按同一天进行配对（216对PSEs-梦境配对和215对MCs-梦境配对）。然后，参与者被要求找出他们的事件-梦境配对的相似特征（人物、物体、地点、动作、情感和主题），并给出他们的事件-梦境配对的匹配分数。此外，我们提出了一种让独立评判者将清醒事件与梦境进行匹配的方法（外部评分）。外部评分的评判标准是寻找事件和梦境之间的相似行为。基于这个评判标准，三名独立评判者被要求对参与者的事件-梦境配对进行评分。首先，我们比较了两种自我评分方法。斯皮尔曼相关性表明这两种方法彼此显著相关。这些结果表明，不同种类相似特征的总和可用于表示所报告的清醒事件与梦境之间相关性程度的自我评分。回归相关性表明，对于PSEs-梦境配对，人物、动作、情感和主题是影响同一天事件与梦境之间相关性程度的相似特征，对于MCs-梦境配对，人物、地点、情感和主题是影响同一天事件与梦境之间相关性程度的相似特征。这些结果表明，不同种类的相似特征对清醒事件与梦境匹配程度的自我评分评估有不同影响。其次，我们比较了自我评分的结果和外部评分的结果。斯皮尔曼相关性表明自我评分的结果与外部评分的结果显著相关。所以本研究的外部评分方法可能适用于未来的研究。此外，由于本研究的外部评分可以对梦境隐喻进行评分，我们还对梦境隐喻进行了简短讨论。未来的研究可以使用该方法探索梦境隐喻。
Zotero 插件