Kahan Tracey L, Claudatos Stephanie
Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University, United States.
Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University, United States.
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:159-76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
Self-ratings of dream experiences were obtained from 144 college women for 788 dreams, using the Subjective Experiences Rating Scale (SERS). Consistent with past studies, dreams were characterized by a greater prevalence of vision, audition, and movement than smell, touch, or taste, by both positive and negative emotion, and by a range of cognitive processes. A Principal Components Analysis of SERS ratings revealed ten subscales: four sensory, three affective, one cognitive, and two structural (events/actions, locations). Correlations (Pearson r) among subscale means showed a stronger relationship among the process-oriented features (sensory, cognitive, affective) than between the process-oriented and content-centered (structural) features--a pattern predicted from past research (e.g., Bulkeley & Kahan, 2008). Notably, cognition and positive emotion were associated with a greater number of other phenomenal features than was negative emotion; these findings are consistent with studies of the qualitative features of waking autobiographical memory (e.g., Fredrickson, 2001).
使用主观体验评定量表(SERS),从144名大学女生的788个梦境中获取了梦境体验的自我评定。与以往研究一致,梦境的特点是视觉、听觉和运动出现的频率高于嗅觉、触觉或味觉,同时包含积极和消极情绪以及一系列认知过程。对SERS评定进行的主成分分析揭示了十个分量表:四个感觉分量表、三个情感分量表、一个认知分量表和两个结构分量表(事件/动作、地点)。分量表均值之间的相关性(皮尔逊r)表明,与以过程为导向的特征(感觉、认知、情感)之间的关系比与以过程为导向和以内容为中心的(结构)特征之间的关系更强——这一模式是根据以往研究预测得出的(例如,Bulkeley & Kahan,2008)。值得注意的是,与消极情绪相比,认知和积极情绪与更多其他现象特征相关;这些发现与清醒时自传体记忆的质性特征研究一致(例如,Fredrickson,2001)。