• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Relationship Between Personality Types in MBTI and Dream Structure Variables.MBTI人格类型与梦的结构变量之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 12;11:1589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01589. eCollection 2020.
2
Jungian personality typology and the recall of everyday and archetypal dreams.荣格人格类型学与日常梦境和原型梦境的回忆
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):1021-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.5.1021.
3
Continuity or compensation? - A hypothesis testing study concerning two types of dreamers' Aggressive Behaviors in Nightmares.连续性还是补偿性?——关于两种类型的梦魇梦者在梦中的攻击行为的假设检验研究。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 May;101:103321. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103321. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
4
A Paradigm for Matching Waking Events Into Dream Reports.一种将清醒事件与梦境报告相匹配的范式。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01430. eCollection 2020.
5
Continuity between waking activities and dream activities.清醒活动与梦境活动之间的连续性。
Conscious Cogn. 2003 Jun;12(2):298-308. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00072-7.
6
An Attempt at Matching Waking Events Into Dream Reports by Independent Judges.由独立评判员将清醒事件与梦境报告进行匹配的尝试。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 6;9:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00465. eCollection 2018.
7
Frequency of dream sharing: the effects of gender and personality.梦境分享的频率:性别和个性的影响。
Am J Psychol. 2010 Spring;123(1):93-101. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.1.0093.
8
Dissociated Effects of Age and Recent Troubling Experiences on Nightmares, Threats and Negative Emotions in Dreams.年龄与近期困扰经历对噩梦、梦境中的威胁及负面情绪的分离效应
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 3;13:770380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.770380. eCollection 2022.
9
Testing the Empathy Theory of Dreaming: The Relationships Between Dream Sharing and Trait and State Empathy.检验梦境的共情理论:梦的分享与特质共情和状态共情之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 20;10:1351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01351. eCollection 2019.
10
Characteristics of the memory sources of dreams: A new version of the content-matching paradigm to take mundane and remote memories into account.梦境记忆来源的特点:一种新的内容匹配范式,用于考虑平凡和遥远的记忆。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0185262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185262. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Will Healthcare Workers Accept a COVID-19 Vaccine When It Becomes Available? A Cross-Sectional Study in China.医护人员在新冠疫苗上市后会接种吗?一项在中国开展的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 20;9:664905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.664905. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
An Attempt at Matching Waking Events Into Dream Reports by Independent Judges.由独立评判员将清醒事件与梦境报告进行匹配的尝试。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 6;9:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00465. eCollection 2018.
2
Beyond the neuropsychology of dreaming: Insights into the neural basis of dreaming with new techniques of sleep recording and analysis.超越梦境的神经心理学:借助新的睡眠记录和分析技术,深入了解梦境的神经基础。
Sleep Med Rev. 2017 Oct;35:8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Dreaming and personality: Wake-dream continuity, thought suppression, and the Big Five Inventory.梦境与人格:清醒梦的连续性、思维抑制与大五人格量表
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Autobiographical memory and hyperassociativity in the dreaming brain: implications for memory consolidation in sleep.梦境大脑中的自传体记忆与超联想性:对睡眠中记忆巩固的启示
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:874. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00874. eCollection 2015.
5
Comparing personal insight gains due to consideration of a recent dream and consideration of a recent event using the Ullman and Schredl dream group methods.运用乌尔曼和施雷德尔梦境分组方法,比较因思考近期梦境和思考近期事件而获得的个人洞察力。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 18;6:831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00831. eCollection 2015.
6
The dream-lag effect: Selective processing of personally significant events during Rapid Eye Movement sleep, but not during Slow Wave Sleep.梦延迟效应:快速眼动睡眠期间对个人重要事件进行选择性加工,而慢波睡眠期间则不然。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Jul;122:98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
7
Dreaming and insight.做梦与顿悟。
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 24;4:979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00979. eCollection 2013.
8
Resting brain activity varies with dream recall frequency between subjects.静息状态下大脑活动在不同个体间随梦境回忆频率而变化。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1594-602. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.6. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
Script-like attachment representations in dreams containing current romantic partners.梦中包含当前浪漫伴侣的类似脚本的附件表现。
Attach Hum Dev. 2012;14(5):501-15. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.706395.
10
Assessing the dream-lag effect for REM and NREM stage 2 dreams.评估 REM 和 NREM 睡眠阶段 2 梦境的梦滞后效应。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026708. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

MBTI人格类型与梦的结构变量之间的关系。

Relationship Between Personality Types in MBTI and Dream Structure Variables.

作者信息

Zhao Chuanwen, Wang Jiaxi, Feng Xiaoling, Shen Heyong

机构信息

School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 12;11:1589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01589. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01589
PMID:32903428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7434928/
Abstract

This study aimed to explore relationships between personality type variables and dream structure variables. In the questionnaire experiment ( = 410), we investigated associations between different personality variables in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator questionnaire (MBTI) and various aspects of dreams in the Mannheim Dream questionnaire (MADRE). The MBTI has four dimensions. In the Extroversion/Introversion (E/I) dimension, I types dreamt more of emotional intensity and passive emotions than E types. In addition, I types may become more distressed in nightmares than E types. E types more frequently shared their dreams with others. In the Sensation/Intuition (S/N) dimension, N types had a more positive attitude toward dreams and can get more novel ideas and help from their dreams than S types. In the dream diary experiment ( = 47), we investigated whether the S/N dimension may influence waking events' incorporation into dreams. External judges decoded paired waking events and dream reports. N types had more metaphorical incorporation than S types. More specifically, N types had more metaphorical expressions in their dreams than S types. This result may be due to the different characteristics between S types and N types. It may provide support for the dream continuity hypothesis.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨人格类型变量与梦境结构变量之间的关系。在问卷调查实验(n = 410)中,我们调查了迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标问卷(MBTI)中不同人格变量与曼海姆梦境问卷(MADRE)中梦境各个方面之间的关联。MBTI有四个维度。在外向/内向(E/I)维度上,I型人比E型人更多地梦到情感强度和消极情绪。此外,I型人在噩梦中可能比E型人更痛苦。E型人更频繁地与他人分享他们的梦境。在感觉/直觉(S/N)维度上,N型人对梦境的态度更积极,并且比S型人能从梦境中获得更多新颖的想法和帮助。在梦境日记实验(n = 47)中,我们调查了S/N维度是否可能影响清醒事件融入梦境。外部评判者对配对的清醒事件和梦境报告进行解码。N型人的隐喻性融入比S型人更多。更具体地说,N型人在梦中的隐喻性表达比S型人更多。这一结果可能是由于S型人和N型人之间的不同特征。它可能为梦境连续性假说提供支持。