• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《儿童灾难:评估与康复协议(CIDER)》对韩国创伤青少年的疗效。

Efficacy of the 'Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery (CIDER)' Protocol for Traumatized Adolescents in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Meditation Psychology, Nungin University, Hwaseong, Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jul 27;35(29):e240. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e240.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e240
PMID:32715670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7384899/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of trauma-focused group therapy in adolescents exposed to traumatic events in Korea.

METHODS

We recruited 22 adolescents (mean age, 16 years; standard deviation, 1.43; range, 13-18 years). Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery (CIDER) V1.0 is a trauma-focused group therapy comprising eight 50-minute-long sessions. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated using the Korean version of the Children's Response to Traumatic Events Scale-Revised (K-CRTES-R), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the State Anxiety Inventory for Children (SAIC), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

A significant improvement was revealed in trauma-related symptom scores ( = -2.85, < 0.01), depressive symptom scores ( = -2.35, < 0.05) and quality of life scores ( = -3.08, < 0.01). Additionally, a marginally significant improvement was found in anxiety symptom scores ( = -1.90, = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

CIDER is a potentially effective intervention for adolescents exposed to traumatic events. Larger controlled trials are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0004681.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估创伤焦点团体治疗在韩国创伤暴露青少年中的可行性。

方法

我们招募了 22 名青少年(平均年龄 16 岁,标准差 1.43,范围 13-18 岁)。儿童灾难评估与恢复(CIDER)V1.0 是一种创伤焦点团体治疗,包含 8 次 50 分钟长的疗程。采用儿童创伤事件反应量表修订版(K-CRTES-R)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、儿童状态焦虑量表(SAIC)和儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL)评估干预效果。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析数据。

结果

创伤相关症状评分( = -2.85, < 0.01)、抑郁症状评分( = -2.35, < 0.05)和生活质量评分( = -3.08, < 0.01)均显著改善。此外,焦虑症状评分也有明显改善( = -1.90, = 0.058)。

结论

CIDER 可能是一种对创伤暴露青少年有效的干预措施。需要更大规模的对照试验来进一步验证。

试验注册

临床研究信息服务标识符:KCT0004681。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the 'Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery (CIDER)' Protocol for Traumatized Adolescents in Korea.《儿童灾难:评估与康复协议(CIDER)》对韩国创伤青少年的疗效。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jul 27;35(29):e240. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e240.
2
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review).用于治疗儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理疗法(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 May;8(3):1004-116. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1916.
3
A prospective study of posttraumatic stress and depressive reactions among treated and untreated adolescents 5 years after a catastrophic disaster.一项关于灾难性灾难发生5年后接受治疗和未接受治疗的青少年创伤后应激和抑郁反应的前瞻性研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;162(12):2302-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2302.
4
Psychosocial intervention for postdisaster trauma symptoms in elementary school children: a controlled community field study.小学儿童灾后创伤症状的心理社会干预:一项对照社区实地研究。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Mar;156(3):211-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.3.211.
5
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD006726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006726.pub2.
6
Promising Effect of the Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery Intervention on Trauma Symptoms and Quality of Life for Children and Adolescents: A Controlled Study.灾难中的儿童的积极影响:儿童和青少年创伤症状及生活质量的评估与恢复干预:一项对照研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Feb;21(2):123-132. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0202. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Outcome of psychotherapy among early adolescents after trauma.创伤后青少年早期心理治疗的结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Apr;154(4):536-42. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.4.536.
8
School-based mental health intervention for children affected by political violence in Indonesia: a cluster randomized trial.印度尼西亚针对受政治暴力影响儿童的校本心理健康干预:一项整群随机试验。
JAMA. 2008 Aug 13;300(6):655-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.6.655.
9
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Eight German Mental Health Clinics.创伤焦点认知行为疗法对儿童和青少年的疗效:八项德国精神卫生诊所的随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(3):159-70. doi: 10.1159/000442824. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Promising Effect of the Children in Disaster: Evaluation and Recovery Intervention on Trauma Symptoms and Quality of Life for Children and Adolescents: A Controlled Study.灾难中的儿童的积极影响:儿童和青少年创伤症状及生活质量的评估与恢复干预:一项对照研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Feb;21(2):123-132. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0202. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
2
Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Stress among the Community-based Urban Pediatric Population in Korea.韩国社区城市儿科人群中的不良童年经历(ACEs)和压力暴露情况。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Dec 28;35(50):e421. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e421.

本文引用的文献

1
Child maltreatment and depression: A meta-analysis of studies using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.儿童虐待与抑郁:使用儿童期创伤问卷的研究的荟萃分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Apr;102:104361. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104361. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
2
A randomized controlled trial examining the impact of individual trauma-focused therapy for individuals receiving group treatment for depression.一项随机对照试验,研究针对接受抑郁症团体治疗的个体进行的个体创伤聚焦疗法的影响。
Psychol Psychother. 2021 Mar;94(1):81-100. doi: 10.1111/papt.12268. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
Effectiveness of trauma-focused treatment for adolescents with major depressive disorder.针对患有重度抑郁症的青少年的创伤聚焦治疗的有效性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 8;10(1):1682931. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1682931. eCollection 2019.
4
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in adults with serious mental illness within forensic and rehabilitation services: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.法医与康复服务机构中针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人创伤后应激障碍的眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Nov 21;20(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3760-2.
5
Internet-Based Intervention for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Using Remote Imagery Rehearsal Therapy to Treat Nightmares.基于互联网的创伤后应激障碍干预:使用远程图像排练疗法治疗噩梦。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(5):315-316. doi: 10.1159/000501105. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Post-Traumatic Stress, Quality of Life and Alcohol Use Problems among Out-of-School Youth.失学青少年的创伤后应激障碍、生活质量与酒精使用问题
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Mar;16(3):193-198. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.12.25.3. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Evaluating Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma and Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADCT) in Norwegian child and adolescent outpatient clinics: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.挪威儿童和青少年门诊对焦虑、抑郁、创伤及品行问题儿童的模块化治疗方法评估(MATCH-ADCT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3074-9.
8
Treating PTSD: A Review of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Interventions.治疗创伤后应激障碍:循证心理治疗干预综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 2;12:258. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00258. eCollection 2018.
9
Sustainability of Psychological First Aid Training for the Disaster Response Workforce.灾难应对人员心理急救培训的可持续性
Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(S5):S381-S382. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304643. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Utility of the Beck Depression Inventory in measuring major depression among individuals seeking HIV testing in the Western Cape, South Africa.贝克抑郁量表在南非西开普省寻求艾滋病毒检测的个体中测量重度抑郁症的效用。
AIDS Care. 2018 Jan-Dec;30(sup1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1499856.