Chainitikun Sudpreeda, Long James P, Rodriguez-Bautista Ruben, Iwase Toshiaki, Tripathy Debu, Fujii Takeo, Ueno Naoto T
Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Oct;183(3):729-739. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05837-6. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) and targeted therapy (CDK4/6 or mTOR inhibitors) are standard of care for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). When ET is not effective, chemotherapy is commonly used. However, clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in the endocrine-resistant setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors and the compare efficacies of chemotherapy agents in endocrine-resistant MBC.
We conducted a retrospective study of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received chemotherapy after progression on ET with or without targeted therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1999 to 2017. We collected baseline clinicopathological and all treatment data. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) of first-line chemotherapy for MBC.
For the 1258 patients analyzed, mean age was 55.3 years (range 21-91). Previous treatment with targeted therapy was recorded for 390 patients (31%): 264 with CDK4/6 inhibitor, 205 with mTOR inhibitor, and 79 treated with both. The most frequent chemotherapy agents were capecitabine (48.9%) and taxanes (28.6%). After adjustment for all factors in a multivariate model, previous treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor had the strongest negative effect on TTF regardless of ET duration (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95%CI 1.49-2.27; p < 0.001). Conversely, capecitabine had significantly longer median TTF than taxanes regardless of whether patients had prior exposure to taxanes in primary setting (6.1 vs 4.9 months; HR 0.64; 95%CI 0.55-0.75; p < 0.001).
Previous exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitor had a negative predictive effect for the efficacy of chemotherapy. Capecitabine had the best efficacy against endocrine-resistant breast cancer.
内分泌治疗(ET)与靶向治疗(CDK4/6或mTOR抑制剂)联合是激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的标准治疗方案。当内分泌治疗无效时,通常采用化疗。然而,内分泌抵抗情况下化疗的临床疗效有限。本研究的目的是确定预测因素并比较内分泌抵抗性MBC中化疗药物的疗效。
我们对1999年至2017年在MD安德森癌症中心接受内分泌治疗(无论是否联合靶向治疗)进展后接受化疗的激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性MBC患者进行了一项回顾性研究。我们收集了基线临床病理和所有治疗数据。主要终点是MBC一线化疗的治疗失败时间(TTF)。
在分析的1258例患者中,平均年龄为55.3岁(范围21-91岁)。390例患者(31%)有靶向治疗史:264例使用CDK4/6抑制剂,205例使用mTOR抑制剂,79例同时使用两者。最常用的化疗药物是卡培他滨(48.9%)和紫杉烷类(28.6%)。在多变量模型中对所有因素进行调整后,无论内分泌治疗持续时间如何,既往使用CDK4/6抑制剂治疗对TTF的负面影响最强(风险比[HR]1.84;95%置信区间1.49-2.27;p<0.001)。相反,无论患者在初始治疗中是否曾接触过紫杉烷类,卡培他滨的中位TTF均显著长于紫杉烷类(6.1个月对4.9个月;HR 0.64;95%置信区间0.55-0.75;p<0.001)。
既往接触CDK4/6抑制剂对化疗疗效有负面预测作用。卡培他滨对内分泌抵抗性乳腺癌疗效最佳。