Luckett Tim, San Martin Aljon, Currow David C, Johnson Miriam J, Barnes-Harris Matilda Mm, Phillips Jane L
IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Greenwich, NSW, Australia.
Palliat Med. 2020 Dec;34(10):1291-1304. doi: 10.1177/0269216320940153. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer are both life-limiting diseases that confer burden in the form of symptoms and affect functioning and quality of life. Comparing burden between these diseases is of interest to determine whether people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease require improved access to Specialist Palliative Care. Access should be based on needs rather than diagnosis or prognosis but is limited for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared to lung cancer.
The aim of this study was to synthesise research comparing burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer to estimate relative need for Specialist Palliative Care.
A systematic review was conducted of observational quantitative studies published in English peer-reviewed journals comparing burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer (PROSPERO CRD42018108819). No limits were placed on disease stage. Meta-analyses were performed where studies used the same measure; otherwise, synthesis used a narrative approach. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.
Electronic databases were searched in September 2019.
Of 790 articles returned, 13 were included, reporting 11 studies. Risk of bias was generally moderate. Except for pain, burden tended to be at least as substantial from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as from lung cancer, with breathlessness and impacts on functioning being significantly worse. Longitudinal studies suggest that people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease live with burden for longer.
Efforts should be made to ensure that access to Specialist Palliative Care is commensurate with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease's substantial and long-lasting burden. Future research should clarify whether managing burden in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer requires different approaches.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌都是危及生命的疾病,会带来症状负担,影响身体功能和生活质量。比较这两种疾病的负担,有助于确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者是否需要更好地获得专科姑息治疗。获得专科姑息治疗应基于需求而非诊断或预后,但与肺癌患者相比,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者获得专科姑息治疗的机会有限。
本研究旨在综合比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌负担的研究,以估计对专科姑息治疗的相对需求。
对发表在英文同行评审期刊上的观察性定量研究进行系统综述,比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌的负担(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库CRD42018108819)。对疾病阶段不设限制。当研究使用相同测量方法时进行荟萃分析;否则,采用叙述性综合方法。使用医疗保健研究与质量机构的工具评估偏倚风险。
2019年9月检索电子数据库。
在检索到的790篇文章中,纳入了13篇,报告了11项研究。偏倚风险一般为中度。除疼痛外,慢性阻塞性肺疾病的负担往往至少与肺癌一样严重,其中呼吸困难及对身体功能的影响明显更差。纵向研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者负担持续的时间更长。
应努力确保获得专科姑息治疗的机会与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的严重且持久的负担相匹配。未来的研究应阐明,管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺癌的负担是否需要不同的方法。