Suen Angela O, Bischoff Kara, Iyer Anand S, Radhakrishnan Keerthana, Fenton Cynthia, Singer Jonathan P, Sudore Rebecca L, Kotwal Ashwin, Farrand Erica
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Chest. 2024 Dec;166(6):1487-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
Patients with lung cancer, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and COPD have high symptom burden, poor quality of life, and high health care use at the end of life. Although proactive integration of palliative care in lung cancer can improve outcomes, it is unclear whether similar practices have been adopted in COPD and IPF care.
Do patients with COPD and IPF have different patterns of health care and palliative care use at the end of life compared with patients with lung cancer?
We retrospectively identified deceased patients with lung cancer, COPD, or IPF with ≥ 1 outpatient visit at the University of California, San Francisco, in the last 6 months of life. We compared outpatient palliative care and opioid prescriptions, inpatient palliative care, hospitalizations, intensive care use, and in-hospital death in the last 6 months of life between each group. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted ORs (aORs) of each outcome, with lung cancer as the reference group.
Among 1,819 patients, patients with COPD and IPF were more likely to be male and older at the time of death compared with patients with lung cancer. Compared with patients with lung cancer, patients with COPD and IPF showed a lower adjusted odds (P < .001) of receiving outpatient palliative care (COPD: aOR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.19-0.36]; IPF: aOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.32-0.70]), outpatient opioid prescription (COPD: aOR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.40-0.63]; IPF: aOR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.29-0.54]), and a higher odds of end-of-life ICU use (COPD: aOR, 2.88 [95% CI, 2.11-3.93]; IPF: aOR, 4.15 [95% CI, 2.66-6.49]). Patients with IPF showed higher odds of receiving inpatient palliative care (aOR: 2.02 [95% CI, 1.30-3.13]; P = .002).
This study showed that patients with COPD and IPF are less likely to receive outpatient palliative care and opioid prescriptions and are more likely to use end-of-life intensive care than patients with lung cancer. Further research should explore health system barriers contributing to differences in care patterns to optimize quality of life and to align with patient goals of care.
肺癌、特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在生命末期症状负担重、生活质量差且医疗保健利用率高。尽管在肺癌治疗中积极整合姑息治疗可改善预后,但尚不清楚COPD和IPF治疗中是否采用了类似做法。
与肺癌患者相比,COPD和IPF患者在生命末期的医疗保健和姑息治疗使用模式是否不同?
我们回顾性确定了加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校在患者生命最后6个月内有≥1次门诊就诊记录的已故肺癌、COPD或IPF患者。我们比较了每组患者生命最后6个月内的门诊姑息治疗和阿片类药物处方、住院姑息治疗、住院次数、重症监护使用情况及院内死亡情况。我们使用多变量逻辑回归计算每个结局的调整比值比(aOR),以肺癌患者作为参照组。
在1819例患者中,与肺癌患者相比,COPD和IPF患者在死亡时更可能为男性且年龄更大。与肺癌患者相比,COPD和IPF患者接受门诊姑息治疗(COPD:aOR,0.26[95%CI,0.19 - 0.36];IPF:aOR,0.48[95%CI,0.32 - 0.70])、门诊阿片类药物处方(COPD:aOR,0.50[95%CI,0.40 - 0.63];IPF:aOR,0.40[95%CI,0.29 - 0.54])的调整比值较低(P <.001),而生命末期使用重症监护的比值较高(COPD:aOR,2.88[95%CI,2.11 - 3.93];IPF:aOR,4.15[95%CI,2.66 - 6.49])。IPF患者接受住院姑息治疗的比值较高(aOR:2.02[95%CI,1.30 - 3.13];P =.002)。
本研究表明,与肺癌患者相比,COPD和IPF患者接受门诊姑息治疗和阿片类药物处方的可能性较小,而生命末期使用重症监护的可能性较大。进一步研究应探索导致治疗模式差异的卫生系统障碍,以优化生活质量并符合患者的治疗目标。