Social Science and Research Ethics Department, Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 25;38(5):637-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab024.
Due to the uncertain disease trajectory and variable rate of progression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), health care professionals (HCPs) are challenged in explaining what the future may hold for patients compared to those with lung cancer (LC). Support and communication of timely information can significantly improve health outcomes.
This study sought to identify factors that impact communication and support and recommend ways to improve patients' understanding of living with life-threatening illness.
Semi-structured interviews with patients with LC (n = 22) and advanced COPD (n = 18), their informal carers (21 LC and 18 COPD) and HCPs (n = 51). Patients were recruited from primary and secondary care in the East of England, UK, during 2010-12.
Directness and clarity characterized communication in LC, whereas uncertainty and limited explanations predominated in COPD. Discussions on how the disease might impact on decisions and preferences to be made in the future were less common in COPD. Information for LC patients was mainly from hospital clinicians and any information for COPD patients mainly from primary care clinicians.
The experience of COPD patients could be improved by professionals soon after diagnosis explaining to them the typical pattern of decline in COPD, highlighting the inherent uncertainties about when exacerbations and death may occur. This conversation should lead to planning for the different challenges that the patient and informal carer recognize as most important to them. This contrasts with the 'breaking bad news' conversation that oncologists are highly trained to deliver.
由于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疾病轨迹不确定,进展速度不同,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在向患者解释未来可能会发生什么情况方面面临挑战,而这些情况与肺癌(LC)患者不同。及时提供支持和沟通信息可以显著改善健康结果。
本研究旨在确定影响沟通和支持的因素,并提出改善患者对危及生命疾病的理解的方法。
对 22 名 LC 患者(n=22)和 18 名晚期 COPD 患者(n=18)、他们的非专业照顾者(21 名 LC 和 18 名 COPD)和 51 名 HCPs 进行半结构式访谈。患者于 2010-12 年期间在英国英格兰东部的初级和二级保健机构招募。
LC 中的沟通直接而清晰,而 COPD 中则主要是不确定性和有限的解释。关于疾病如何影响未来可能做出的决策和偏好的讨论在 COPD 中较少见。LC 患者的信息主要来自医院临床医生,而 COPD 患者的任何信息主要来自初级保健临床医生。
在诊断后不久,专业人员向 COPD 患者解释 COPD 典型的衰退模式,强调关于何时可能发生恶化和死亡的固有不确定性,可以改善 COPD 患者的体验。这种对话应导致为患者和非专业照顾者认为最重要的不同挑战进行规划。这与肿瘤学家高度训练的“告知坏消息”对话形成对比。