Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arbo Unie, Occupational Health Service, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236582. eCollection 2020.
Sit-stand workstations have been shown to be effective in reducing sitting time in office workers. The aim of this study was to explore reasons for use and non-use of sit-stand workstations and strategies to decrease sitting and increase physical activity in the workplace from perspectives of users and non-users, as well as from managers and ergo-coaches.
Six group interviews with employees who have had access to sit-stand workstations for several years were conducted in a large semi-governmental organisation in the Netherlands. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Open coding was conducted by three researchers and codes and themes were discussed within the research team.
Thematic analysis resulted in two major themes: 1) Reasons for use and non-use and 2) Strategies to increase standing and physical activity in the workplace. Shared and distinct reasons for use and non-use were identified between users and non-users of the sit-stand workstations. The most important reasons for use indicated by users were that they had experiencing immediate benefits, including staying alert and increasing focus; these benefits were not acknowledged by non-users. Non-users indicated that sitting was comfortable for them and that they were therefore not motivated to use the standing option. Strategies to increase the use of the standing option included an introductory phase to become familiar with working while standing and to experience the immediate benefits that come from using the standing option. Furthermore, providing reminders to use the standing option was suggested as a strategy to increase and sustain the use of sit-stand workstations. Increased use may lead to a change in the sitting culture within the organisation, as more employees would adopt active movement behaviours.
Immediate benefits of the use of the standing option-only mentioned by the users-was the most distinct reason to use sit-stand workstations. Future research should explore how to motivate potential users to adhere to an introductory phase in order to experience these immediate benefits, whether it is linked to the use of sit-stand workstations or other interventions to reduce sitting time.
坐站式工作站已被证明可有效减少办公人员的久坐时间。本研究旨在从使用者和非使用者、管理者和人体工程学教练的角度探讨使用和不使用坐站式工作站的原因,以及减少工作场所久坐和增加身体活动的策略。
在荷兰的一个大型半政府组织中,对使用坐站式工作站已有数年的员工进行了六次小组访谈。对逐字记录的转录进行了主题分析。三位研究人员进行了开放式编码,研究团队内部对编码和主题进行了讨论。
主题分析产生了两个主要主题:1)使用和不使用的原因;2)在工作场所增加站立和身体活动的策略。使用者和非使用者都明确表示了使用和不使用坐站式工作站的原因。使用者认为使用该工作站可立即获得益处,包括保持警觉和提高专注力,而非使用者则不认同这些益处。非使用者表示,他们坐着很舒服,因此没有动力使用站立选项。增加使用站立选项的策略包括引入一个熟悉站立工作的阶段,以体验使用站立选项带来的直接益处。此外,有人建议提供使用站立选项的提醒,作为增加和维持使用坐站式工作站的策略。更多员工采用积极的运动行为,可能会导致组织内久坐文化的改变。
使用者唯一提到的使用站立选项的即时益处,是使用坐站式工作站的最显著原因。未来的研究应该探讨如何激励潜在用户坚持引入阶段,以体验这些直接益处,无论这是否与使用坐站式工作站或其他减少久坐时间的干预措施有关。