Suppr超能文献

遗传和表观遗传生物标志物组合对结直肠癌检测的诊断价值:一项系统评价

Diagnostic value of genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.

作者信息

Alampritis Georgios, Thoukididou Sarah Nohelia, Ramos Maria, Georgiou Pantelis, Kalofonou Melpomeni, Simillis Constantinos

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 22;40(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04904-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Exploration of effective screening methods is imperative to improve current screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). Our aim was to systematically search the literature to identify and assess the diagnostic accuracy of both genetic and epigenetic biomarker panels for CRC detection using liquid biopsies for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from stool, blood, or urine.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) with searches in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web Of Science from inception up to March 20, 2025, using pre-defined keywords. Study quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 tool (Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). Primary and secondary outcomes were panel performance (sensitivity and specificity) for CRC, advanced precancerous lesions (APL), and staging of disease.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included. Exceptional performance for both CRC (sensitivity and specificity) and APL (sensitivity) was displayed by biomarker panels including methylated SDC2 with methylated SFRP1/2 (CRC: 91.5%/97.3%, APL: 89.2%) or methylated TFPI2 (CRC: 94.9%/98.1%, APL: 100%), and a 5-biomarker panel of mutational targets APC, Bat-26, KRAS, L-DNA, and p53 (CRC: 91.0%/93.0%, APL: 82.0%). Suboptimal APL sensitivities up to 57.0% were exhibited by Cologuard and variant panels (including KRAS, methylated BMP3, methylated NDRG4, FIT), and 47.8% for combinations including methylated SEPT9.

CONCLUSIONS

High-performance, candidate ctDNA biomarker panels with exceptional diagnostic accuracy for both CRC and APL have been identified. Further work should focus on the development of large-scale studies to justify their clinical implementation.

摘要

目的

探索有效的筛查方法对于改进当前的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查至关重要。我们的目的是系统检索文献,以识别和评估用于CRC检测的基因和表观遗传生物标志物组合的诊断准确性,这些组合使用来自粪便、血液或尿液的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)进行液体活检。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行系统评价,使用预定义关键词在Medline、Embase、CENTRAL和Web of Science中从创刊至2025年3月20日进行检索。使用QUADAS - 2工具(诊断准确性研究质量评估2)进行研究质量评估。主要和次要结局是CRC、高级癌前病变(APL)和疾病分期的组合性能(敏感性和特异性)。

结果

纳入了44项研究。包括甲基化SDC2与甲基化SFRP1/2(CRC:91.5%/97.3%,APL:89.2%)或甲基化TFPI2(CRC:94.9%/98.1%,APL:100%)的生物标志物组合以及包含突变靶点APC、Bat - 26、KRAS、L - DNA和p53的5生物标志物组合(CRC:91.0%/93.0%,APL:82.0%)在CRC(敏感性和特异性)和APL(敏感性)方面均表现出卓越性能。Cologuard及其变体组合(包括KRAS、甲基化BMP3、甲基化NDRG4、FIT)的APL敏感性高达57.0%,表现欠佳,包括甲基化SEPT9的组合的APL敏感性为47.8%。

结论

已识别出对CRC和APL均具有卓越诊断准确性的高性能候选ctDNA生物标志物组合。进一步的工作应集中于开展大规模研究以证明其临床应用的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7afb/12098509/6dac06af51bb/384_2025_4904_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验