• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府卫生支出、自付费用与社会不平等:对中国和经合组织国家的跨国分析。

Government health expenditure, out-of-pocket payment and social inequality: A cross-national analysis of China and OECD countries.

机构信息

School of Sociology and Political Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1111-1126. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.3017
PMID:32725673
Abstract

This study aims to assess the association between Chinese out-of-pocket payments and government health spending, investigating their variation ratio in the context of OECD countries. Aggregated time-series data of 37 countries (from China and official OECD members) were collected from the World Bank Open Data source and analyzed using the multiple linear regression models. Benchmarking approach was applied to evaluate the causes of healthcare expenditure rise per capita. The results showed that China's government health expenditure was positively associated with out-of-pocket payment rise, with a higher variation score of 42.70%. The association was statistically significant at 5%. Likewise, the association between government expenditure and out-of-pocket payment in the OECD countries was positively significant at 1%, and their variation score was 2.41%. Health financing in OECD countries showed higher stability and equity than that in China. Policy implications for China is to reduce the distributional disparity of government health funds by tax adjustments in health services, universal health coverage, the removal of social health insurance disparities, and a single health payment method.

摘要

本研究旨在评估中国自费支出与政府卫生支出之间的关联,并考察在经合组织(OECD)国家背景下两者之间的变化比例。本研究从世界银行公开数据资源中收集了来自中国和经合组织正式成员国的 37 个国家的汇总时间序列数据,并使用多元线性回归模型进行了分析。本研究采用基准方法评估了人均医疗支出增长的原因。结果表明,中国政府卫生支出与自费支出增长呈正相关,变化比例为 42.70%,得分较高。这种关联在 5%的水平上具有统计学意义。同样,OECD 国家政府支出与自费支出之间的关联在 1%的水平上呈正相关,其变化比例为 2.41%。OECD 国家的卫生筹资比中国更稳定和公平。对中国的政策启示是,通过调整卫生服务税收、全民健康覆盖、消除社会医疗保险差异以及单一的卫生支付方式,减少政府卫生资金的分配差距。

相似文献

1
Government health expenditure, out-of-pocket payment and social inequality: A cross-national analysis of China and OECD countries.政府卫生支出、自付费用与社会不平等:对中国和经合组织国家的跨国分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1111-1126. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
Changes in health expenditures in China in 2000s: has the health system reform improved affordability.21 世纪初中国卫生支出的变化:医疗体制改革是否提高了可负担性。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Jun 13;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-40.
3
Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.广西全民健康覆盖后卫生筹资公平性研究:基于 2009-2013 年广西壮族自治区农村地区卫生支出比较的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 29;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0669-9.
4
Hong Kong's domestic health spending--financial years 1989/90 through 2004/05.香港本地医疗开支——1989/90至2004/05财政年度。
Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Apr;14 Suppl 2:2-23.
5
Improving the performance of social health insurance system through increasing outpatient expenditure reimbursement ratio: a quasi-experimental evaluation study from rural China.通过提高门诊支出报销比例来提高社会医疗保险制度绩效:来自中国农村的准实验评估研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 25;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0799-8.
6
How much do we spend on prescription medicines? Out-of-pocket costs for patients in Australia and other OECD countries.我们在处方药上花费了多少钱?澳大利亚及其他经合组织国家患者的自付费用。
Aust Health Rev. 2011 Aug;35(3):341-9. doi: 10.1071/AH10906.
7
Analyzing the impact of fiscal conditions on private health expenditures in OECD countries: a quantile ARDL investigation.分析财政状况对经合组织国家私人卫生支出的影响:分位数 ARDL 研究。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Sep;24(3):439-463. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09377-0. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
Hong Kong domestic health spending: financial years 1989/90 to 2011/12.香港本地医疗支出:1989/90至2011/12财政年度
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Jun;21(3 Suppl 3):1-24.
9
The impact of changes in private health expenditure on New Zealand households.私人医疗支出变化对新西兰家庭的影响。
Health Policy. 2001 Dec;58(3):215-29. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00161-0.
10
An overview of health financing patterns and the way forward in the WHO African Region.世界卫生组织非洲区域卫生筹资模式概述及未来发展方向
East Afr Med J. 2006 Sep;83(9 Suppl):S1-28. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v83i9.9492.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of health expenditures in China from 2000 to 2019 compared with the world and upper-middle-income countries.2000年至2019年中国卫生支出与世界及中高收入国家的比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;12:1464214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1464214. eCollection 2024.
2
The Effect of Digital Supervision of China Basic Medical Insurance on Out-of-pocket Expenditure: Evidence from Quasi-natural Experiment.中国基本医疗保险数字化监管对自付支出的影响:来自准自然实验的证据。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241301528. doi: 10.1177/00469580241301528.
3
Personalized messaging enhances hospital debt collection while prosocial appeals fail: Evidence from a field experiment.
个性化信息传递可提高医院债务回收效率,而亲社会诉求则不然:来自一项实地实验的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 1;10:20552076241277035. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277035. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Does younger children's social health insurance alleviate household impoverishment due to illness?少儿社会医疗保险能缓解因病致贫吗?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11558-z.
5
Trends in under-five mortality rate in China, 1996-2020: a Joinpoint regression and correlation analysis.1996-2020 年中国 5 岁以下儿童死亡率趋势:联合回归和相关分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e077461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077461.
6
Random forest model used to predict the medical out-of-pocket costs of hypertensive patients.用于预测高血压患者医疗自付费用的随机森林模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 17;12:1382354. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1382354. eCollection 2024.
7
Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey.补充私人健康保险是否会激励家庭进行风险金融资产投资?来自中国家庭金融调查的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2022 Dec;22(4):369-421. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09326-9. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
8
Maternal mortality ratio in China from 1990 to 2019: trends, causes and correlations.中国 1990 年至 2019 年孕产妇死亡率:趋势、原因和相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):1536. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11557-3.
9
Can health service equity alleviate the health expenditure poverty of Chinese patients? Evidence from the CFPS and China health statistics yearbook.卫生服务公平能否缓解中国患者的卫生支出贫困?来自 CFPS 和《中国卫生统计年鉴》的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 21;21(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06675-y.