• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从骨折联络服务中出院的患者仍需要随访和骨骼健康建议。

Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice.

机构信息

University of New South Wales Rural Clinical School, Coffs Harbour, Australia.

Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00787-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-020-00787-4
PMID:32728971
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Fracture liaison services (FLSs) were established to address the well-recognised gap in bone health management after a fragility fracture. However, it is unclear what happens to patients after discharge from an FLS. Our study suggests FLSs should include a patient bone health education session and a follow-up telephone call 12-18 months post-discharge to optimise management, in particular, to assess therapy adherence and to reinforce bone health advice.

PURPOSE

While fracture liaison services (FLSs) have improved bone health management following fragility fracture, it is unclear what happens to patients following discharge from these services. We sought to determine patient self-reported medication adherence and the need for bone-specific health advice ≥ 12 months following discharge from one of the first FLSs in Australia.

METHODS

Patients were contacted by telephone ≥ 12 months following discharge from the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic (CFPC)/FLS to determine if the patient was still taking prescribed bone protective therapy (BPT). Bone health advice was provided, if appropriate, during the telephone interview.

RESULTS

Of the 516 consecutive patients seen in CFPC from July 2012-December 2018, 326 (63.2%) were assessed and discharged from the clinic. One hundred and two patients (19.8%) were lost to follow-up/uncontactable. Of 190 patients commenced on BPT at CFPC and who were discharged ≥ 12 months prior, 141 (74.2%) self-reported adherence with BPT. Bone health advice was required during the telephone call in 60/190 (31.6%) of these patients. Of the 141 adherent patients, 40 (28.4%) had attended a bone health education session, compared to 4/49 (8.2%) patients in the non-adherent group (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

At 19 months following discharge from our FLS, self-reported adherence with treatment was 74%. One bone health education session at baseline was associated with increased treatment adherence. At time of telephone contact, one third of patients required further advice to optimise bone health.

摘要

目的

骨折联络服务(FLS)改善了脆性骨折后骨健康管理,但患者从这些服务中出院后会发生什么情况尚不清楚。我们旨在确定患者在从澳大利亚首个 FLS 之一出院后≥12 个月时的自我报告药物依从性和对骨特异性健康建议的需求。

方法

从 2012 年 7 月至 2018 年 12 月,在科夫斯骨折预防诊所(CFPC)/FLS 接受治疗并出院≥12 个月的患者通过电话进行联系,以确定患者是否仍在服用规定的骨保护治疗(BPT)。如果需要,将在电话访谈中提供骨健康建议。

结果

在 2012 年 7 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在 CFPC 就诊的 516 例连续患者中,有 326 例(63.2%)接受评估并从诊所出院。102 例(19.8%)失访/无法联系。在 190 例在 CFPC 开始接受 BPT 并出院≥12 个月的患者中,有 141 例(74.2%)自我报告坚持使用 BPT。在这些患者中,有 60/190(31.6%)名患者需要在电话通话中提供骨健康建议。在 141 名依从性患者中,有 40 名(28.4%)参加了骨健康教育课程,而在不依从性组的 49 名患者中仅有 4 名(8.2%)(p=0.004)。

结论

在从我们的 FLS 出院 19 个月后,自我报告的治疗依从性为 74%。基线时的一次骨健康教育课程与增加治疗依从性有关。在电话联系时,三分之一的患者需要进一步的建议以优化骨健康。

相似文献

1
Patients discharged from a fracture liaison service still require follow-up and bone health advice.从骨折联络服务中出院的患者仍需要随访和骨骼健康建议。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00787-4.
2
Secondary fracture prevention needs to happen in the country too: The first two and a half years of the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic.该国也需要开展继发性骨折预防工作:科夫斯骨折预防诊所的头两年半情况
Aust J Rural Health. 2017 Feb;25(1):28-33. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12291. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
3
Rationale, study design, and descriptive data of the Lucky Bone™ Fracture Liaison Service.幸运骨骨折联络服务的基本原理、研究设计和描述性数据。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Feb 12;14(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0571-8.
4
Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture.预防未来骨折:与门诊骨折联络服务以及髋部骨折患者标准管理相比,矫形骨科骨折联络服务的效果。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec 11;12(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0373-9.
5
Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Lille University Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service between January 2016 and January 2018.骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防:2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间里尔大学医院骨折联络服务的评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Sep;30(9):1779-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05036-0. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.脆性骨折联络服务,以捕捉治疗脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的“错失机会”。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1861-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4559-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Fracture liaison services combined with online home nursing care in fragility hip fracture: a comparative effectiveness pilot study.脆性髋部骨折的骨折联络服务与在线家庭护理相结合:一项比较有效性的试点研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Feb 21;18(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01221-1.
8
A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network.骨折联络服务有效性测量和质量改进指导的患者层面关键绩效指标集:国际骨质疏松基金会、国家骨质疏松基金会和脆性骨折网络 IOF Capture the Fracture 工作组的立场文件。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jul;31(7):1193-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Effectiveness of fracture liaison services in osteoporosis.骨折联络服务在骨质疏松症中的有效性。
Joint Bone Spine. 2023 Sep;90(5):105574. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105574. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
10
Compliance to The Joint Commission proposed Core Measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015.对联合委员会提出的骨质疏松症相关骨折核心指标集的依从性:2010年至2015年在开放医疗系统中对不同二级骨折预防项目的回顾
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0307-6. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-year follow-up of a novel orthopedic ward fracture liaison services (OWFLS) model.新型骨科病房骨折联络服务(OWFLS)模式的 3 年随访。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Apr;52(4):3000605241245280. doi: 10.1177/03000605241245280.
2
The role of the fracture liaison service in the prevention of atypical femoral fractures.骨折联络服务在预防非典型股骨骨折中的作用。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023 Nov 28;15:1759720X231212747. doi: 10.1177/1759720X231212747. eCollection 2023.
3
Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance.支持患者从骨质疏松症治疗中获益最大化:关于有效措施、适用人群和实施环境的快速现实审查。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Nov;33(11):2245-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06453-4. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
4
Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service.骨折联络服务中髋部骨折治疗后的长期持续治疗。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 7;12(1):9373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13465-x.
5
Fracture liaison service model: treatment persistence 5 years later.骨折联络服务模式:5 年后的治疗坚持情况。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Apr 4;16(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00925-6.