CiS Toxicology, Osorno, Chile.
Department of Toxicology, Institut für Toxikologie, University of Würzburg, Versbacher Strasse 9, 97078, Würzburg, Germany.
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Nov;96(11):3127-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03336-9. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
This commentary proposes an approach to risk assessment of mixtures of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) as EFSA was tasked to derive a tolerable intake for a group of 27 PFAS. The 27 PFAS to be considered contain different functional groups and have widely variable physicochemical (PC) properties and toxicokinetics and thus should not treated as one group based on regulatory guidance for risk assessment of mixtures. The proposed approach to grouping is to split the 27 PFAS into two groups, perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, and apply a relative potency factor approach (as proposed by RIVM) to obtain two separate group TDIs based on liver toxicity in rodents since liver toxicity is a sensitive response of rodents to PFAS. Short chain PFAS and other PFAS structures should not be included in the groups due to their low potency and rapid elimination. This approach is in better agreement with scientific and regulatory guidance for mixture risk assessment.
本评论提出了一种评估全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)混合物风险的方法,因为 EFSA 被要求为一组 27 种 PFAS 推导可耐受摄入量。这 27 种 PFAS 包含不同的官能团,具有广泛变化的物理化学(PC)性质和毒代动力学特性,因此不应根据混合物风险评估的监管指南将其视为一组。建议的分组方法是将 27 种 PFAS 分为全氟烷基羧酸酯和全氟烷基磺酸盐两组,并应用相对效力因子方法(由 RIVM 提出),根据啮齿动物的肝毒性获得两个单独的组 TDI,因为肝毒性是 PFAS 对啮齿动物的敏感反应。由于低效力和快速消除,短链 PFAS 和其他 PFAS 结构不应包含在这些组中。这种方法更符合混合物风险评估的科学和监管指南。