Suppr超能文献

中国 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情期间一线和非一线医务人员的心理健康:一项病例对照研究。

The mental health of frontline and non-frontline medical workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: A case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Zhongnan hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, PR China.

Sleep Assessment Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new infectious disease with high transmissibility and morbidity. It has caused substantial mental distress to medical professionals. We aimed to compare the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak between frontline and non-frontline medical workers in China.

METHODS

This case-control study recruited 1173 frontline and 1173 age- and sex-matched non-frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 outbreak (February 11 to 26, 2020). A set of online questionnaires were used to measure mental problems (i.e., anxiety, insomnia, and depressive symptoms), and help-seeking behavior and treatment for these mental problems.

RESULTS

Frontline medical workers had higher rates of any mental problem (52.6% vs. 34.0%, adjusted OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.57-2.25), anxiety symptoms (15.7% vs. 7.4%, adjusted OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.46-2.61), depressed mood (marginally insignificant; 14.3% vs. 10.1%, adjusted OR=1.32, 95% CI=0.99-1.76) and insomnia (47.8% vs. 29.1%, adjusted OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.63-2.36) than non-frontline medical workers. No significant difference was observed in terms of suicidal ideation (12.0% vs. 9.0%, adjusted OR=1.25, 95% CI=0.92-1.71), help-seeking (4.5% vs. 4.5%, adjusted OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.53-1.87) or treatment (3.4% vs. 2.3%, adjusted OR=1.38, 95% CI=0.54-3.52) for mental problems.

LIMITATIONS

The case-control nature of the data precludes causal inferences, and there is a possibility of bias related to self-reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Frontline medical workers had more mental problems but comparable help-seeking behaviors and treatment for these problems than non-frontline medical workers. These findings highlight the timely mental support and intervention for medical workers, especially for those on the frontline.

摘要

背景与目的

新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是一种具有高传染性和高发病率的新发传染病。它给医务人员造成了巨大的精神困扰。我们旨在比较中国一线和非一线医务人员在 COVID-19 爆发期间的心理影响。

方法

这项病例对照研究招募了 1173 名一线和 1173 名年龄和性别匹配的非一线医务人员(2020 年 2 月 11 日至 26 日)。一套在线问卷用于测量精神问题(即焦虑、失眠和抑郁症状),以及对这些精神问题的求助行为和治疗。

结果

一线医务人员出现任何精神问题的比例较高(52.6%比 34.0%,调整后的 OR=1.88,95%CI=1.57-2.25)、焦虑症状(15.7%比 7.4%,调整后的 OR=1.95,95%CI=1.46-2.61)、抑郁情绪(略有不显著;14.3%比 10.1%,调整后的 OR=1.32,95%CI=0.99-1.76)和失眠(47.8%比 29.1%,调整后的 OR=1.96,95%CI=1.63-2.36)比非一线医务人员更高。在自杀意念(12.0%比 9.0%,调整后的 OR=1.25,95%CI=0.92-1.71)、求助行为(4.5%比 4.5%,调整后的 OR=1.00,95%CI=0.53-1.87)或精神问题治疗(3.4%比 2.3%,调整后的 OR=1.38,95%CI=0.54-3.52)方面,两组之间没有显著差异。

局限性

数据的病例对照性质排除了因果关系推断,并且可能存在与自我报告相关的偏倚。

结论

一线医务人员的精神问题较多,但求助行为和治疗与非一线医务人员相当。这些发现强调了及时为医务人员,特别是一线医务人员提供精神支持和干预。

相似文献

9
Psychological status of surgical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间外科医护人员的心理状况。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112955. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112955. Epub 2020 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

4
Workers' well-being during viral pandemics and epidemics: A scoping review.病毒性大流行和流行病期间工人的福祉:一项范围综述。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2025 Mar 4;22:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2025.100286. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

2
Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems.中国 COVID-19 疫情与相关心理问题。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102092. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间中国的在线心理健康服务。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e17-e18. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30077-8. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验