Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; New York State Psychiatric Institute.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.091. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
To assess within and across diagnosis variability we examined fear processing in healthy controls (HC) and three diagnostic groups that share symptoms of pathological anxiety: obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD); social anxiety disorder (SAD), and anorexia nervosa (AN).
Unmedicated adults (N=166) participated in a paradigm assessing associative fear acquisition, extinction, extinction recall, and fear renewal. Data were analyzed from two perspectives: comparison of each disorder to HC and exploratory latent class analysis (LCA) of the combined data.
The diagnosis-based analyses indicated significantly increased fear renewal in OCD and trends toward decreased extinction recall in OCD and increased renewal in SAD. The LCA indicated four Response Types, none of which were congruent with the diagnostic categories. Most participants had a normative response (50%) or a moderate extinction recall deficit (30%). The two remaining groups (8% each) had more extreme responses: one showed complete failure of extinction recall; the other persistent arousal in expectation of, but prior to, actual conditioning (threat sensitivity).
Due to small sample size (N=20) results for AN are regarded as preliminary.
Our diagnosis-based findings are consistent with previous data suggesting an association between pathological anxiety and difficulties maintaining fear extinction. The LCA reveal substantial within-diagnosis heterogeneity in fear processing and support inclusion of empirically driven approaches as a complement to standard analyses. This heterogeneity may also have implications for treatment, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy, which relies on strengthening extinction recall and requires patients to tolerate anxious expectation in order to engage with feared situations.
为了评估诊断内和诊断间的变异性,我们检查了健康对照组(HC)和三个具有病理性焦虑症状的诊断组(强迫症、社交焦虑症和神经性厌食症)的恐惧处理。
未用药的成年人(N=166)参与了评估联想恐惧获得、消退、消退回忆和恐惧再现的范式。数据分析从两个角度进行:每个障碍与 HC 的比较和合并数据的探索性潜在类别分析(LCA)。
基于诊断的分析表明,强迫症的恐惧再现显著增加,强迫症和社交焦虑症的消退回忆趋势下降,社交焦虑症的恐惧再现增加。LCA 表明存在四种反应类型,没有一种与诊断类别一致。大多数参与者有正常的反应(50%)或中等程度的消退回忆缺陷(30%)。其余两组(各占 8%)的反应更为极端:一组表现出完全无法回忆消退;另一组则在实际条件作用(威胁敏感性)之前持续产生预期的唤醒。
由于样本量小(N=20),神经性厌食症的结果被认为是初步的。
我们基于诊断的发现与先前的数据一致,表明病理性焦虑与维持恐惧消退困难有关。LCA 揭示了恐惧处理中的大量诊断内异质性,并支持将经验驱动的方法纳入标准分析的补充。这种异质性也可能对治疗产生影响,特别是认知行为疗法,它依赖于增强消退回忆,并要求患者忍受焦虑的预期,以便参与到恐惧的情境中。