Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, #530, Little Rock, AR, 72205-7199; USA.
School of Human Ecology; Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3167, Ruston, LA, 71272, USA.
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104806. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104806. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
Early care and education teachers' (ECETs) dietary and feeding behaviors have the potential to influence children's health outcomes. This study sought to: (1) gather data on the properties and performance of the CFQ and CFSQ in an ECET sample and compare properties to published parent samples and (2) examine relations between FI experiences by ECETs and reported feeding practices, and (3) examine relations between FI experiences by ECETs and reported feeding practices. ECETs completed 506 cross-sectional surveys. Mean patterns, ranges, and internal consistency values on the adapted instruments for ECETs were consistent with those published for parents. Significant mean differences between parents and ECETs on established scales using one-sample t-tests were prevalent with medium to large effect sizes despite small, relative differences. The majority of ECETs were authoritarian (35.6%), followed by indulgent (29.2%), authoritative (17.9%), and uninvolved (17.3%). T-tests indicated that ECETs who were currently food insecure were significantly higher than teachers who were currently food secure on scales of perceived responsibility, concern about child weight, restriction, pressure to eat, monitoring, demandingness, and responsiveness (all p < .001). Chi-square tests found that food insecurity was not independent from ECET feeding style, with a greater occurrence of authoritarian and less of indulgent feeding styles for ECETs who were food insecure. Overall, analyses support that two popular measures of feeding practices function similarly in ECETs as they do in parents. Additionally, results demonstrate associations between food insecurity and ECETs' feeding practices.
早期保育和教育教师(ECETs)的饮食和喂养行为有可能影响儿童的健康结果。本研究旨在:(1)收集 ECET 样本中 CFQ 和 CFSQ 的特性和性能数据,并将其与已发表的父母样本进行比较;(2)检验 ECETs 的 FI 经验与报告的喂养实践之间的关系;(3)检验 ECETs 的 FI 经验与报告的喂养实践之间的关系。ECETs 完成了 506 份横断面调查。适应于 ECETs 的工具的平均模式、范围和内部一致性值与已发表的父母数据一致。尽管相对差异较小,但使用单样本 t 检验对已建立的量表进行的父母和 ECETs 之间的显著平均差异普遍存在中等至大的效应量。大多数 ECETs 是专制型(35.6%),其次是放纵型(29.2%)、权威型(17.9%)和冷漠型(17.3%)。t 检验表明,目前处于粮食不安全状态的 ECETs 在感知责任、关心孩子体重、限制、进食压力、监测、要求和反应性等方面的得分显著高于目前处于粮食安全状态的教师(均 p<0.001)。卡方检验发现,粮食不安全与 ECET 喂养方式不独立,粮食不安全的 ECET 更倾向于采用专制型喂养方式,而较少采用放纵型喂养方式。总的来说,分析结果支持两种流行的喂养实践测量方法在 ECETs 中的作用与在父母中的作用相似。此外,结果表明粮食不安全与 ECETs 的喂养实践之间存在关联。