Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Natural Resources Institute (IRENA), University of León, 24071, León, Spain.
Department of Electrical, Systems and Automatic. Engineering, School of Electrical, Industrial and Informatics, University of León, Campus de Vegazana, 24071, León, Spain.
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jul 31;192(8):551. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08521-w.
Changes in consumer demand due to preferences for a healthier lifestyle have led to a new market offering fruit and salad products ready to eat. This affects the agro-industrial sector and the characteristic of waste streams generated having the organic fraction higher quality and representing a new opportunity of valorisation. This study experimentally evaluated the digestion of wastes derived from the fourth range product sector. It was also proposed the use of this digestate as a fermentation medium for producing plant growth-promoting cultures. Three digestion scenarios were studied: Scenario 1 considered biogas valorisation using a combined heat and power (CHP) unit. Scenario 2 featured biogas upgrading to be used as vehicle fuel. Finally, scenario 3 evaluated the transport of waste materials to the digestion plant by a network of pipes and pumps directly from the production chain. All three scenarios included the land application of a biostimulator based on the production of a plant growth-promoting culture derived from digestate. Life cycle analysis and life cycle costing were used to determine potential environmental impacts and costs over a lifetime of 25 years. The study showed that scenario 1 was the most favourable option for valorising this type of waste, although the economic assessment resulted in negative values for all three alternatives.
由于对健康生活方式的偏好,消费者需求的变化导致了一个新的市场,提供水果和沙拉产品,即食。这影响了农业综合企业部门,所产生的废物流的特点是有机部分具有更高的质量,并代表了新的增值机会。本研究通过实验评估了源自第四范围产品部门的废物的消化情况。还提出了将这种消化物用作发酵介质来生产植物生长促进培养物的用途。研究了三种消化方案:方案 1 考虑利用热电联产 (CHP) 单元来实现沼气增值。方案 2 的特点是沼气升级,用作车辆燃料。最后,方案 3 评估了通过管道和泵网络从生产链直接将废物材料运输到消化厂。所有三个方案都包括基于从消化物中生产的植物生长促进培养物的生物刺激剂的土地应用。生命周期分析和生命周期成本核算用于确定在 25 年的生命周期内的潜在环境影响和成本。研究表明,方案 1 是这种废物增值的最有利选择,尽管经济评估对所有三种替代方案都产生了负值。