• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将以人为本的叙事融入电子健康记录:研究方案。

Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record: Study Protocol.

机构信息

Heather Coats, PhD, APRN-BC, is Assistant Professor of Research, College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Nadia Shive, BA, CCRC, is Professional Research Assistant, College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora. Ardith Z. Doorenbos, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Nursing Collegiate Professor, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, and Director of Palliative Care and Co-leader of Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago. Sarah Schmiege, PhD, is Biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2020 Nov/Dec;69(6):483-489. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000463.

DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000463
PMID:32740306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9766876/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incorporating a patient's personal narrative into the electronic health record is an opportunity to more fully integrate the patient's values and beliefs into care, thus creating opportunities to deliver high-quality/high-value, person-centered care.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to present a study protocol of a narrative intervention to (a) compare the effects of the narrative intervention to usual care on primary outcome of person's (patient) perceptions of quality of communication, (b) compare the effects of the narrative intervention on secondary outcomes of biopsychosocial well-being, and (c) examine the feasibility and acceptability of the narrative intervention from the perspective of both persons: the patient and the acute care bedside nurse.

METHODS

A randomized control trial is being conducted with a targeted enrollment of 80 patient participants and 80 nurse participants. The patient participants include individuals who are admitted to the acute care hospital for either heart failure or end-stage renal disease. An acute care beside nurse who has cared for the patient participant is also enrolled. Through a 1:1 random allocation scheme, stratified by illness, we will enroll 40 in the narrative intervention group and 40 in the usual care group. Patient participants will be assessed for patient-reported outcomes of patient's perception of quality of communication and biopsychosocial well-being.

RESULTS

The study began in October 2019; 53 potential patient participants have been approached, 21 have enrolled, and 20 have completed the data collection process.

DISCUSSION

The testing and integration of a person-centered narrative into the electronic health record is a novel approach to provide opportunities for improvement in communication between patients and nurses. The results from this study will provide important preliminary knowledge to inform future randomized clinical trials of narrative interventions leading to advances in how to best provide high-value, high-quality, person-centered care for persons living with serious illness.

摘要

背景

将患者的个人叙事纳入电子健康记录是一个将患者的价值观和信仰更全面地融入护理的机会,从而为提供高质量/高价值、以患者为中心的护理创造机会。

目的

本研究旨在介绍一项叙事干预研究方案,以(a)比较叙事干预与常规护理对患者对沟通质量感知的主要结果的影响,(b)比较叙事干预对生物心理社会福祉的次要结果的影响,以及(c)从患者和急性护理床边护士的角度探讨叙事干预的可行性和可接受性。

方法

正在进行一项随机对照试验,目标纳入 80 名患者参与者和 80 名护士参与者。患者参与者包括因心力衰竭或终末期肾病而住院的个体。也招募了照顾过患者参与者的急性护理床边护士。通过 1:1 随机分配方案,按疾病分层,我们将招募 40 名叙事干预组和 40 名常规护理组。患者参与者将评估患者对沟通质量和生物心理社会福祉的感知的患者报告结果。

结果

该研究于 2019 年 10 月开始;已经接触了 53 名潜在的患者参与者,有 21 名患者参与,并且有 20 名患者完成了数据收集过程。

讨论

将以患者为中心的叙事纳入电子健康记录的测试和整合是一种新颖的方法,可以为改善患者和护士之间的沟通提供机会。本研究的结果将为未来的叙事干预随机临床试验提供重要的初步知识,以推进如何为患有严重疾病的患者提供最佳的高价值、高质量、以患者为中心的护理。

相似文献

1
Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record: Study Protocol.将以人为本的叙事融入电子健康记录:研究方案。
Nurs Res. 2020 Nov/Dec;69(6):483-489. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000463.
2
Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record.将以人为本的叙事融入电子健康记录。
Nurs Res. 2023;72(6):421-429. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
"We Wanna Be Nurses Because We Want the Human Connection": Acceptability and Usability of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Acute Care Setting.“我们想成为护士,因为我们想要与人建立联系”:在急性护理环境中使用以人为中心的叙事干预的可接受性和实用性。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Oct 1;26(5):E143-E153. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000001043. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
"Connection": The Integration of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention into the Electronic Health Record: An Implementation Study."连接":将以人为中心的叙事干预融入电子健康记录的整合:一项实施研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):785-791. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0376. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
An Electronically Delivered Person-Centered Narrative Intervention for Persons Receiving Palliative Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一项针对接受姑息治疗者的电子传递的以患者为中心的叙事干预:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 21;12:e41787. doi: 10.2196/41787.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Use of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Outpatient Palliative Care Setting: A Feasibility Study.以患者为中心的叙事干预在门诊姑息治疗环境中的应用:一项可行性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Sep 18;10:23743735231202729. doi: 10.1177/23743735231202729. eCollection 2023.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
10
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.人工智能在精神科护理实践中的未来:一项综合综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/inm.70003.
2
Participation in eHealth Communication Interventions Among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Scoping Review.参与血液透析患者的电子健康沟通干预措施:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 11;26:e51900. doi: 10.2196/51900.
3
Use of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Outpatient Palliative Care Setting: A Feasibility Study.以患者为中心的叙事干预在门诊姑息治疗环境中的应用:一项可行性研究。
J Patient Exp. 2023 Sep 18;10:23743735231202729. doi: 10.1177/23743735231202729. eCollection 2023.
4
Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record.将以人为本的叙事融入电子健康记录。
Nurs Res. 2023;72(6):421-429. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000680. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
5
Experiences of dignity: Age at onset of serious illness matters.尊严的体验:发病年龄很重要。
6
An Electronically Delivered Person-Centered Narrative Intervention for Persons Receiving Palliative Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一项针对接受姑息治疗者的电子传递的以患者为中心的叙事干预:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 21;12:e41787. doi: 10.2196/41787.
7
Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic.必要与非必要:在 COVID-19 大流行期间对患有严重疾病的人群进行非 COVID 研究的伦理问题。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Feb 1;24(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000808.

本文引用的文献

1
"Connection": The Integration of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention into the Electronic Health Record: An Implementation Study."连接":将以人为中心的叙事干预融入电子健康记录的整合:一项实施研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):785-791. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0376. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
2
National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, 4th Edition.国家共识项目临床实践指南:优质姑息治疗指南,第 4 版。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;21(12):1684-1689. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0431. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Effect of a Patient and Clinician Communication-Priming Intervention on Patient-Reported Goals-of-Care Discussions Between Patients With Serious Illness and Clinicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.患者和临床医生沟通启动干预对严重疾病患者和临床医生之间患者报告的治疗目标讨论的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):930-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2317.
4
PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores.PROMIS-29 v2.0 概况身心健康综合评分。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition: [Excerpt].《疾病叙事:苦难、治愈与人类状况》:[节选]
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1406. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001864.
6
Performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Profile in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Fibromyalgia, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.患者报告结局测量信息系统29项量表在类风湿关节炎、骨关节炎、纤维肌痛和系统性红斑狼疮中的表现
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Sep;69(9):1312-1321. doi: 10.1002/acr.23183. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
African American Elders' Serious Illness Experiences: Narratives of "God Did," "God Will," and "Life Is Better".非裔美国老年人的重病经历:“上帝已做”“上帝会做”和“生活更美好”的叙事
Qual Health Res. 2017 Apr;27(5):634-648. doi: 10.1177/1049732315620153. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Adult Domain Framework Using Item Response Theory Scores.使用项目反应理论分数对患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)成人领域框架进行验证性因素分析。
Med Care. 2015 Oct;53(10):894-900. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000413.
9
US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.使用患者报告结果测量信息系统29项简表(PROMIS-29)对健康结果进行的美国评估。
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005.
10
A novel approach to enhancing hope in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised phase II trial of dignity therapy.一种增强晚期癌症患者希望的新方法:尊严疗法的随机II期试验。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):315-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000054. Epub 2011 Oct 9.