Votes, populism, and pandemics.
作者信息
Gugushvili Alexi, Koltai Jonathan, Stuckler David, McKee Martin
机构信息
University of Oslo, Postboks 1096 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research On Social Dynamics and Public Policy, Bocconi University, Via Guglielmo Rontgen, 1, 20136, Milan, Italy.
出版信息
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jul;65(6):721-722. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01450-y. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Votes, populism, and pandemics.投票、民粹主义与大流行病
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jul;65(6):721-722. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01450-y. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic.医学民粹主义与 COVID-19 大流行。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Oct;15(10):1417-1429. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain.民粹主义与女权主义政治：芬兰与西班牙的案例
Eur J Polit Res. 2019 Nov;58(4):1108-1128. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12333. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
4
Populism, Exclusion, Post-truth. Some Conceptual Caveats Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy".民粹主义、排斥、后真相。关于“多元自由民主国家中后真相民粹主义的兴起：对卫生政策的挑战”的一些概念性警示
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Mar 1;7(3):268-271. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.80.
5
"Stop, You're Killing us!" An Alternative Take on Populism and Public Health Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy".“停下，你们在杀人！”对“后真相民粹主义在多元自由民主国家的兴起：对健康政策的挑战”的另一种看法
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):673-675. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.50.
6
The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy.多元自由民主国家中后真相民粹主义的兴起：对健康政策的挑战。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):249-251. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.19.
7
This Is My (Post) Truth, Tell Me Yours Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy".这是我的（后真相）观点，告诉我你对“多元自由民主国家中后真相民粹主义的兴起：对健康政策的挑战”的看法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):723-725. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.58.
8
Gender, Populism, and the QAnon Conspiracy Movement.性别、民粹主义与匿名者Q阴谋运动
Front Sociol. 2021 Jan 21;5:615727. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.615727. eCollection 2020.
9
Populism and Protest.民粹主义与抗议活动。
Front Sociol. 2021 Feb 10;5:619235. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.619235. eCollection 2020.
10
Populism Is Always Gendered and Dangerous.民粹主义总是带有性别色彩且危险。
Front Sociol. 2021 Jan 11;5:625385. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.625385. eCollection 2020.
引用本文的文献
1
From Transaction to Transformation: Building Trust in Health Systems; A Response to Recent Commentaries.从交易到转型：建立对卫生系统的信任；对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9188. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9188. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Pandemics, populism and bioethics: A critical approach.大流行、民粹主义与生物伦理学：一种批判性方法
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 20;5(5):e0004576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004576. eCollection 2025.
3
Building trust during crises by engaging with existing distrust.通过应对现有的不信任来在危机期间建立信任。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 2;13:1570243. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570243. eCollection 2025.
4
How Did We Get Here: The Best Vaccines Ever Facing the Highest Public Hesitancy?我们如何走到这一步：史上最佳疫苗却面临着最高的公众犹豫态度？
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;11(8):1323. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081323.
5
Populism and health. An evaluation of the effects of right-wing populism on the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.民粹主义与健康。评估右翼民粹主义对巴西 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0269349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269349. eCollection 2022.
6
Right-Wing Populism, Social Identity Theory, and Resistance to Public Health Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.右翼民粹主义、社会认同理论与新冠疫情期间对公共卫生措施的抵制
Int J Public Health. 2022 May 12;67:1604812. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604812. eCollection 2022.
7
The Approach to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Georgia-A Health Policy Analysis.《格鲁吉亚对 COVID-19 大流行的应对措施-一项卫生政策分析》
Int J Public Health. 2022 May 3;67:1604410. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604410. eCollection 2022.
8
Political Populism, Institutional Distrust and Vaccination Uptake: A Mediation Analysis.政治民粹主义、制度信任缺失与疫苗接种率：一项中介分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063265.
9
Commentary: Some Social, Psychological, and Political Factors That Undermine Compliance With COVID-19 Public Health Measures.评论：一些破坏对COVID-19公共卫生措施遵守情况的社会、心理和政治因素。
Int J Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;66:603944. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.603944. eCollection 2021.
10
The politics of Covid-19 vaccine confidence.新冠疫苗信心的政治学。
Curr Opin Immunol. 2021 Aug;71:92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".民粹主义领导人是否为 COVID-19 的传播创造了条件？评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对欧洲福利政策的影响及其对人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):511-515. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.124.
2
A Population Health Perspective on the Trump Administration, Brexit, and Right-Wing Populism in Europe.从人口健康视角看特朗普政府、英国脱欧及欧洲的右翼民粹主义
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):274-276. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305535.
3
Deaths of Despair and Brexit Votes: Cross-Local Authority Statistical Analysis in England and Wales.绝望之死与英国脱欧公投：英格兰和威尔士跨地方当局统计分析。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Mar;110(3):401-406. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305488. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
4
Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: an analysis of national-level data.民粹主义政治与西欧的疫苗犹豫：基于国家级数据的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;29(3):512-516. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz004.
5
High noon for a sensible decision on Brexit.就英国脱欧做出明智决定的关键时刻。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1599. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32768-5.
6
BMA votes to oppose Brexit "as a whole" and calls for public final say on deal.英国医学协会投票“整体”反对脱欧，并呼吁就脱欧协议进行公众最终表决。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 27;361:k2821. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2821.
7
Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.2016年美国总统大选中不同的预期寿命与投票模式
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1560-1562. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303945. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Zotero 插件