Jett Samuel, Thompson Mallory R, Awasthi Shubhangi, Cuccia David J, Tan Tze-Woei, Armstrong David G, Mazhar Amaan, Weinkauf Craig C
Modulated Imaging Inc, Irvine, CA, USA.
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):25-34. doi: 10.1177/19322968211024666. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
Microvascular disease (MVD) describes systemic changes in the small vessels (~100 um diameter) that impair tissue oxygenation and perfusion. MVD is a common but poorly monitored complication of diabetes. Recent studies have demonstrated that MVD: (i) is an independent risk factor for ulceration and amputation and (ii) increases risk of adverse limb outcomes synergistically with PAD. Despite the clinical relevance of MVD, microvascular evaluation is not standard in a vascular assessment.
We evaluated 299 limbs from 153 patients seen clinically for possible lower extremity PAD. The patients were assessed by ankle brachial index (ABI), toe brachial index (TBI), and spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI). These measurements were evaluated and compared to patient MVD status, defined by clinical diagnoses of (in ascending order of severity) no diabetes; diabetes; diabetes + neuropathy; diabetes + neuropathy + retinopathy.
SFDI-derived parameters HbT1 and StO2 were significantly different across the MVD groups ( < .001). A logistic regression model based on HbT1 and StO2 differentiated limbs with severe MVD (diabetes+neuropathy+retinopathy) from the larger group of limbs from patients with only diabetes ( = .001, area under the curve = 0.844). Neither ABI nor TBI significantly differentiated these populations.
Standard assessment of PAD using ABI and TBI are inadequate for detecting MVD in at-risk populations. SFDI-defined HbT1 and StO2 are promising tools for evaluating MVD. Prospective studies with wound-based outcomes would be useful to further evaluate the role MVD assessment could play in routine clinical evaluation of patients at risk for lower extremity complications.
微血管疾病(MVD)描述了直径约100微米的小血管中的系统性变化,这些变化会损害组织的氧合和灌注。MVD是糖尿病常见但监测不足的并发症。最近的研究表明,MVD:(i)是溃疡和截肢的独立危险因素,(ii)与外周动脉疾病(PAD)协同增加肢体不良结局的风险。尽管MVD具有临床相关性,但微血管评估在血管评估中并非标准操作。
我们评估了153例临床诊断可能患有下肢PAD的患者的299条肢体。通过踝臂指数(ABI)、趾臂指数(TBI)和空间频域成像(SFDI)对患者进行评估。将这些测量结果进行评估,并与根据临床诊断(按严重程度升序排列)分为无糖尿病;糖尿病;糖尿病+神经病变;糖尿病+神经病变+视网膜病变的患者MVD状态进行比较。
MVD各亚组间基于SFDI得出的参数HbT1和StO2存在显著差异(P<0.001)。基于HbT1和StO2的逻辑回归模型能够区分患有严重MVD(糖尿病+神经病变+视网膜病变)的肢体与仅患有糖尿病患者的较大肢体组(P=0.001,曲线下面积=0.844)。ABI和TBI均未显著区分这些人群。
使用ABI和TBI对PAD进行标准评估不足以检测高危人群中的MVD。SFDI定义的HbT1和StO2是评估MVD的有前景的工具。以伤口为基础的结局的前瞻性研究将有助于进一步评估MVD评估在下肢并发症高危患者的常规临床评估中可能发挥的作用。