Chakrabarti Biswajit, Lewis-Burke Nadia, Pearson Mike, Craig Sonya, Davies Lisa, Sheridan Kim, England Philip, McKnight Eddie, Angus Robert
Aintree Chest Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK.
LungHealth Ltd, Swaffham, UK.
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jul 27;6(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00362-2019. eCollection 2020 Jul.
We describe implementation of a clinical decision support system, a computer-guided consultation (CGC), in the assessment of subjects referred with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS).
Two cohorts of patients were assessed. The first 100 cases had data collected with the CGC by a specialist sleep physician (stage1). A further 100 cases were assessed by a nonspecialist using the CGC (stage 2). For each case, the diagnosis suggested by the CGC was compared with the final diagnosis made by a second specialist sleep physician blinded to the CGC diagnosis.
Stage 1: of 100 people evaluated, a final diagnosis of OSAS was made by both the sleep specialist and CGC in 88% of cases. In 7 of the remaining 12 cases, both agreed there was "No evidence of OSAS"; in 5 cases the CGC did not reach a final diagnosis instead prompting specialist referral. Stage 2: 100 people were evaluated; 95% were evaluable. Both CGC and the sleep specialist made a diagnosis of OSAS in 83 cases (87%), in 5 cases both agreed there was no OSAS, whereas in 7 cases the CGC prompted a specialist review due to unexplained symptoms. The CGC was concordant with the final diagnosis in 95% and 93% of cases in the two cohorts, respectively and where there was doubt, prompted for clinical review. No OSAS cases were overlooked by the CGC.
An intelligent CGC program creates opportunities in sleep medicine management pathways to safely yet effectively utilise nonspecialists working under specialist supervision.
我们描述了一种临床决策支持系统,即计算机引导咨询(CGC),在对疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者的评估中的应用。
对两组患者进行了评估。前100例患者由睡眠专科医生通过CGC收集数据(第一阶段)。另外100例患者由非专科医生使用CGC进行评估(第二阶段)。对于每例患者,将CGC给出的诊断与对CGC诊断不知情的另一位睡眠专科医生做出的最终诊断进行比较。
第一阶段:在评估的100人中,睡眠专科医生和CGC均做出OSAS最终诊断的病例占88%。在其余12例中的7例中,二者均认为“无OSAS证据”;在5例中,CGC未得出最终诊断,而是建议转诊至专科医生处。第二阶段:评估了100人;95%可进行评估。CGC和睡眠专科医生均做出OSAS诊断的有83例(87%),5例二者均认为无OSAS,而在7例中,CGC因出现无法解释的症状而建议进行专科复查。在两个队列中,CGC分别在95%和93%的病例中与最终诊断一致,并且在存在疑问时会促使进行临床复查。CGC未漏诊任何OSAS病例。
一个智能的CGC程序为睡眠医学管理途径创造了机会,能够在专科医生的监督下安全有效地利用非专科医生。