How Can We Evaluate Disability without Bias?
作者信息
Kim Sunyoung, Won Chang Won
机构信息
Department of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
出版信息
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Jun;24(2):152-153. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0033. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
How Can We Evaluate Disability without Bias?我们如何无偏见地评估残疾情况？
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Jun;24(2):152-153. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0033. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Combining patient reported outcomes and EHR data to understand population level treatment needs: correcting for selection bias in the migraine signature study.结合患者报告的结果和电子健康记录数据以了解人群层面的治疗需求：校正偏头痛特征研究中的选择偏倚。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Dec 18;5(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00401-2.
3
Justification bias in self-reported disability: New evidence from panel data.自我报告残疾中的合理化偏差：面板数据的新证据。
J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;54:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
The predictive value of attentional bias towards pain-related information in chronic pain patients: a diary study.注意力偏向与疼痛相关信息对慢性疼痛患者的预测价值：一项日记研究。
Pain. 2013 Mar;154(3):468-475. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.008. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
5
Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting.包容遗传学计划：探索以患者为中心的咨询培训对产前环境中身体残疾偏见的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255722. eCollection 2021.
6
Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults.用于成人慢性疼痛（不包括头痛）管理的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub4.
7
Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults.用于成人慢性疼痛管理的心理疗法（互联网提供）
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 26;2014(2):CD010152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010152.pub2.
8
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 22;3(3):CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub3.
9
A Wheelchair Locomotion Interface in a VR Disability Simulation Reduces Implicit Bias.虚拟现实残疾模拟中的轮椅运动界面减少了内隐偏见。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2022 Dec;28(12):4658-4670. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3099115. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of occupational and physical therapy assistants.作业治疗师和物理治疗师助理的显性和隐性残疾态度。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jan;15(1):101217. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101217. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
引用本文的文献
1
London Chest Activity of Daily Living: Reliability and Validity of the European Portuguese Version in Heart Failure Patients.伦敦日常生活能力量表：欧洲葡萄牙语版本在心力衰竭患者中的信度和效度
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;13(4):377. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040377.
2
A Multidimensional, Person-Centered Framework for Functional Assessment in Dementia: Insights from the 'What', 'How', 'To Whom', and 'How Much' Questions.多维、以人为中心的痴呆症功能评估框架：来自“什么”、“如何”、“针对谁”和“多少”问题的见解。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(4):1187-1205. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230376.
3
Disability Incidence Rates for Men and Women in 23 Countries: Evidence on Health Effects of Gender Inequality.23 个国家的男性和女性残疾发生率：性别不平等对健康影响的证据。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):328-338. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa288.
4
Tackling Instrumental Activities of Daily Living: Time to Start Rethinking Items.应对日常生活中的工具性活动：是时候开始重新思考相关项目了。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Sep;24(3):227-228. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0056. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Why Do Older Korean Adults Respond Differently to Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living? A Differential Item Functioning Analysis.为什么韩国老年成年人对日常生活活动和工具性日常生活活动的反应不同？一项差异项目功能分析。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2019 Dec;23(4):197-203. doi: 10.4235/agmr.19.0047. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
Cohort Trends in the Gender Distribution of Household Tasks in the United States and the Implications for Understanding Disability.队列研究：美国家务分工的性别趋势及其对残疾理解的启示
J Aging Health. 2019 Dec;31(10):1748-1769. doi: 10.1177/0898264318793469. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Mild cognitive impairment and deficits in instrumental activities of daily living: a systematic review.轻度认知障碍与工具性日常生活活动能力缺陷：系统综述。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Mar 18;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0099-0. eCollection 2015.
4
[Factors associated with functional dependence in older adults: a secondary analysis of the National Study on Health and Aging, Mexico, 2001].[墨西哥老年人功能依赖相关因素：2001年全国健康与老龄化研究的二次分析]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Jul;22(1):1-11. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000600001.
5
Prevalence and correlates of functional disability in multiethnic elderly Singaporeans.新加坡多民族老年人功能残疾的患病率及其相关因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00533.x.
6
Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort.老年人群体中身体残疾的性别差异。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1406-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1406.
7
STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.老年人疾病研究。日常生活活动能力指数：生物和心理社会功能的标准化测量方法。
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
8
Gender differences in disability: evidence and underlying reasons.残疾方面的性别差异：证据及潜在原因。
Aging (Milano). 2000 Apr;12(2):106-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03339897.
9
Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.老年人评估：日常生活中的自我维持和工具性活动
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86.
10
Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure.对老年人进行筛查。一项简短的日常生活工具性活动测量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Oct;33(10):698-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb01779.x.
Zotero 插件