• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nutrition standards for school food: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.学校食品营养标准实施的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 May 13;3:20. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13041.3. eCollection 2020.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.菜单标签干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素,以支持健康食物选择:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 23;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0752-3.
3
Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Teledentistry From the Perspective of Dental Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Review.从牙科保健专业人员角度看实施远程牙科的障碍与推动因素:一项系统的定量、定性和混合研究综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;12:e44218. doi: 10.2196/44218.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review.从餐饮服务行业角度看实施菜单标签干预措施的障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00948-1.
5
PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.方案:利益相关者参与健康指南制定的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 25;18(2):e1237. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1237. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among ethnic Chinese children: a qualitative systematic review.促进华裔儿童身体活动的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Dec;18(12):2445-2511. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00154.
7
Barriers to and facilitators of labor market engagement for individuals with chronic physical illnesses in their experiences with work disability policy: a qualitative systematic review.慢性病患者在工作残疾政策方面融入劳动力市场的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Feb;20(2):348-536. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00482.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
The determinants of the nutritional quality of food provided to the homeless population: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.为无家可归人群提供的食物的营养质量的决定因素:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 10;12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02286-2.
10
Implementation strategies, facilitators, and barriers to scaling up and sustaining task-sharing in family planning: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.将计划生育中的任务分担扩大和维持的实施策略、促进因素和障碍:一项混合方法系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 7;12(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02356-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and enablers to addressing smoking, nutrition, alcohol consumption, physical activity and gestational weight gain (SNAP-W) as part of antenatal care: A mixed methods systematic review.作为产前护理一部分,解决吸烟、营养、饮酒、身体活动和孕期体重增加问题(SNAP-W)的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法的系统评价
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 9;5(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00655-z.
2
A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.乔安娜·布里格斯研究所终末期共享决策框架方法
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70041. doi: 10.1111/hex.70041.
3
Key influences on university students' physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour.关键影响因素大学生的身体活动:使用理论领域框架和人类行为的 COM-B 模型进行系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4.

学校食品营养标准实施的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价方案

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nutrition standards for school food: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.

作者信息

O'Mahony Breda, Kerins Claire, Murrin Celine, Kelly Colette

机构信息

Home Economics Department, St. Angela's College, Sligo, Ireland.

Discipline of Health Promotion, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2021 May 13;3:20. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13041.3. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13041.3
PMID:32743340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7372527/
Abstract

The importance of nutrition during childhood and the high prevalence of child and adolescent obesity has resulted in several countries implementing nutritional standards for school food as a way of providing healthy school food environments. Yet, there has been less focus on the barriers and facilitators influencing the process of implementing school food standards. This mixed-methods systematic review aims to address this evidence gap by synthesising the empirical evidence on the factors that may influence the implementation of school food standards. This mixed-methods systematic review will use qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods evidence from peer-reviewed publications retrieved from the following databases; PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Grey literature will be accessed through Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, OpenGrey, RIAN, EThOS, ProQuest, WorldCat, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and public health organisation websites will also be accessed. Screening reference lists and citation chaining of all included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on publication date or language will be applied, however, only primary research studies relevant to supply-side stakeholders will be eligible for inclusion. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Study titles and abstracts will be screened to decide whether the full-text manuscript should be retrieved. For screening reliability, a second review author will assess a random sample of 20%. Kappa statistics will be used to assess inter-rater reliability, with values of 0.75 and higher representing high agreement. Two authors will independently extract data and factors reported to influence implementation. This will be synthesized using the Theoretical Domains Framework. A comprehensive understanding of these factors can provide guidance to relevant stakeholders to enhance the adoption, implementation and sustainability of nutrition standards for school meals. : PROSPERO CRD42019117904.

摘要

儿童期营养的重要性以及儿童和青少年肥胖的高患病率,促使多个国家实施学校食品营养标准,以此营造健康的学校食品环境。然而,对于影响学校食品标准实施过程的障碍和促进因素,人们关注较少。本混合方法系统评价旨在通过综合有关可能影响学校食品标准实施的因素的实证证据,填补这一证据空白。 本混合方法系统评价将使用从以下数据库检索到的同行评审出版物中的定性、定量和混合方法证据:PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、EMBASE、Medline、PsycINFO和Web of Science。灰色文献将通过谷歌学术、开放获取学位论文、OpenGrey、俄罗斯国家科技信息研究所(RIAN)、英国电子论文服务(EThOS)、ProQuest、WorldCat、网络数字论文图书馆获取,还将访问公共卫生组织网站。还将对所有纳入研究的参考文献列表进行筛选和引文链分析。不设出版日期或语言限制,不过,仅与供应方利益相关者相关的原始研究才有资格纳入。将使用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量。将筛选研究标题和摘要,以决定是否应检索全文手稿。为确保筛选可靠性,第二位评审作者将评估20%的随机样本。将使用kappa统计量评估评分者间信度,值为0.75及以上表示高度一致。两位作者将独立提取数据以及报告的影响实施的因素。将使用理论领域框架对其进行综合分析。全面了解这些因素可为相关利益相关者提供指导,以加强学校膳食营养标准的采用、实施和可持续性。:国际系统评价前瞻性注册库CRD42019117904。