Gao Bruce, Bobrowski Adam, Lee Jason
Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Feb;15(2):56-66. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6804.
The holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the gold standard for intracorporeal lithotripsy. Preclinical reports suggest the thulium laser fibre (TFL) may possess advantages over the Ho:YAG laser, including improved lithotripsy efficacy, enhanced safety, and lower costs. Although the TFL is well-characterized in-vitro, there are no reviews examining TFL lithotripsy in a clinical setting.
A review of the literature was conducted using a systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase, yielding a total of 130 manuscripts published up to May 2020. Two independent reviewers selected studies for screening, eligibility, and inclusion into the scoping review. Following the title, abstract, and full-text review, 14 articles were analyzed.
Within these articles, there were 13 prospective cohort studies and one case series. The average sample size was 100 participants. Study followup durations ranged from four weeks to three months. TFL had comparable stone-free rates to Ho:YAG lasers and improved operating time. TFL was subjectively favorable in terms of stone retropulsion, stone fragmentation, endoscopic maneuverability, and endoscopic visibility. TFL appeared clinically safe and did not result in any major complications. Many studies were underpowered and non-peer-reviewed, demonstrating the need for additional research in this field.
The TFL has the potential to catalyze a paradigm shift in laser lithotripsy. While the objective of this scoping review was to describe the contemporary landscape of the literature, it is important to consider that inferences posed by the studies described herein must be tempered by the low quality of available evidence.
钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光是体内碎石术的金标准。临床前报告表明,铥激光光纤(TFL)可能比Ho:YAG激光具有优势,包括提高碎石效果、增强安全性和降低成本。尽管TFL在体外已得到充分表征,但尚无关于临床环境中TFL碎石术的综述。
通过对MEDLINE、PubMed和Embase进行系统检索,对文献进行综述,共检索到截至2020年5月发表的130篇手稿。两名独立评审员选择研究进行筛选、资格评估,并纳入范围综述。经过标题、摘要和全文评审,分析了14篇文章。
在这些文章中,有13项前瞻性队列研究和1个病例系列。平均样本量为100名参与者。研究随访时间从4周到3个月不等。TFL的无石率与Ho:YAG激光相当,且手术时间有所改善。TFL在结石后推、结石破碎、内镜可操作性和内镜视野方面主观上更具优势。TFL在临床上似乎是安全的,未导致任何重大并发症。许多研究样本量不足且未经同行评审,表明该领域需要更多研究。
TFL有可能催化激光碎石术的范式转变。虽然本范围综述的目的是描述文献的当代概况,但重要的是要考虑到,本文所述研究得出的推论必须因现有证据质量较低而受到限制。