Henningfield Jack E, Fields Sherecce, Anthony James C, Brown Lawrence S, Bolaños-Guzmán Carlos A, Comer Sandra D, De La Garza Richard, Furr-Holden Debra, Garcia-Romeu Albert, Hatsukami Dorothy K, Raznahan Armin, Zarate Carlos A
PinneyAssociates and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 4800 Montgomery Lane, Suite 400, Bethesda, MD, 20184, USA.
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Apr;46(5):871-876. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0784-y. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
It is increasingly accepted that higher levels of excellence and innovation in research can be achieved by organizations that promote equity, diversity, and inclusion across several domains including ethnicity and gender. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an overview of the methods used to increase diversity within ACNP, as well as recommendations for accelerating progress. Annual membership surveys confirm increases in female membership and leadership positions, slower but encouraging signals for “Asian” and “Hispanic” members, and less progress for African American and other ethnic populations. Meetings have become visibly more diverse, due in part to ethnic minority travel awards and apparently increasing diversity among guest attendees. Evidence of increasing inclusion includes well-attended networking events and minority-relevant programming, active communications about diversity-related events and resources, and strong statements by ACNP leadership that embrace diversity as a core value and support collaboration among key committees and task forces to identify and implement pro-inclusion and diversity-enhancing efforts. We believe ACNP can accelerate progress with more scientifically valid approaches to assessing diversity and inclusion. The current membership survey includes five outmoded ethnic options and postmeeting surveys that are not designed to assess inclusion efforts and consequences. Measures should be developed that better characterize diversity and assess efforts to reduce the barriers that exist for potential non-White populations (e.g., annual membership and meeting attendance costs). Increased collaboration with NIH and other organizations that are committed to these same goals may also contribute to acceleration of progress by ACNP and other scientific organizations.
越来越多的人认为,在包括种族和性别在内的多个领域促进公平、多样性和包容性的组织能够在研究中实现更高水平的卓越和创新。本评论的目的是概述美国神经精神药理学会(ACNP)内部用于增加多样性的方法,以及加速进展的建议。年度会员调查证实女性会员和领导职位有所增加,“亚洲”和“西班牙裔”会员有缓慢但令人鼓舞的迹象,而非洲裔美国人和其他族裔群体的进展则较小。会议明显变得更加多样化,部分原因是少数族裔旅行奖以及客座参会者的多样性明显增加。包容性增强的证据包括参与度高的社交活动和与少数族裔相关的项目、关于与多样性相关活动和资源的积极沟通,以及ACNP领导层的有力声明,即把多样性作为核心价值,并支持关键委员会和特别工作组之间的合作,以确定和实施促进包容和增强多样性的努力。我们认为,ACNP可以通过更科学有效的方法来评估多样性和包容性,从而加速进展。目前的会员调查包括五个过时的种族选项以及会后调查,这些调查并非旨在评估包容方面的努力和结果。应该制定措施,更好地描述多样性,并评估为减少潜在非白人人群存在的障碍所做的努力(例如年度会员费和会议出席费用)。与美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和其他致力于这些相同目标的组织加强合作,也可能有助于ACNP和其他科学组织加速进展。