Suppr超能文献

提高保护和生态学会议中的性别认同和包容度。

Improving sex and gender identity equity and inclusion at conservation and ecology conferences.

机构信息

Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;4(10):1311-1320. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1255-x. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

Abstract

Conferences are important for professional learning and for building academics' reputations and networks. All members of the scientific community should feel supported and free to contribute their best at such events. I evaluated the actions and policies of conferences held by international academic societies for ecology and conservation since 2009, to assess whether conferences support participation across sexual orientations and gender identities. Although half of the 30 conferences had codes of conduct promoting equity, diversity and inclusion, the quantity and quality of initiatives to support such principles varied between societies and years. Conferences with codes were significantly more likely to implement structural initiatives to minimize discrimination or harassment, such as procedures for reporting misconduct and submission guidelines to promote speaker diversity, as well as initiatives to support parents. Initiatives minimizing barriers to attendance were rare; 47% of conferences were held in locations that discriminate against certain identities and <10% promoted event safety and accessibility to potential attendees. Piecemeal actions and inadequate conference evaluation have resulted in no significant growth in gender equity or diversity initiatives. I propose a six-step timeline that improves conference inclusion by embedding diversity and equity into planning, financing, marketing, scientific and social scheduling, evaluation and reporting.

摘要

会议对于专业学习以及建立学术声誉和网络非常重要。科学界的所有成员都应该感到受到支持,并能够在这些活动中自由地发挥出自己的最佳水平。我评估了自 2009 年以来国际生态学和保护学学术协会举办的会议的行动和政策,以评估会议是否支持各种性取向和性别认同的参与。尽管 30 个会议中有一半制定了促进公平、多样性和包容性的行为准则,但各协会和各年支持这些原则的举措的数量和质量有所不同。有行为准则的会议更有可能采取结构性举措来尽量减少歧视或骚扰,例如制定举报不当行为的程序和促进演讲者多样性的提交准则,以及支持家长的举措。减少参会障碍的举措很少见;47%的会议在歧视某些身份的地点举行,不到 10%的会议宣传活动的安全性和对潜在参与者的可及性。零散的行动和不充分的会议评估导致性别平等或多样性举措没有显著增长。我提出了一个六步时间表,通过将多样性和公平性嵌入到规划、融资、营销、科学和社会日程安排、评估和报告中,来提高会议的包容性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验