Suppr超能文献

轻度认知障碍亚型和认知领域受损数量在预测痴呆进展中的临床实用性:一项 20 年回顾性研究。

Clinical utility of mild cognitive impairment subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains at predicting progression to dementia: A 20-year retrospective study.

机构信息

Mercer Institute for Research on Aging, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;36(1):31-37. doi: 10.1002/gps.5385. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains on initial assessment at predicting progression to dementia in a sample of memory clinic patients over a 20-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of those presenting to a memory clinic with MCI from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2018 inclusive. Those with MCI were broken down into one of the four subtypes using recommended cut-off scores on the Cambridge Cognitive Assessment (CAMCOG). Binomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine the utility of MCI subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains as predictors for dementia.

RESULTS

Overall 1188 individuals with MCI diagnosis were identified, with 378 (32%) progressing to dementia, with median [range] time to diagnosis of 2 years [1-8.4]. Six hundred and forty-nine (55%) were identified as amnestic MCI and 539 (45%) as non-amnestic MCI. Amnestic MCI was a significant predictor of progression compared to non-amnestic MCI (OR = 1.85, df = 1, P < .001). Number of cognitive domains impaired was also a significant predictor of progression to dementia (OR = 1.07, df = 1, P = .01) but the single-/multi-domain distinction was not (OR = 1.29, df = 1, P = .36).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that approximately 32% of those diagnosed with MCI in a memory clinic progressed to dementia, with a median time to progression of 2 years. Those with amnestic MCI are almost twice as likely to progress to dementia than non-amnestic MCI and that therefore this is a useful distinction. However, the utility of the single- and multi-domain MCI distinction is called into question by our findings.

摘要

目的

在一项为期 20 年的记忆门诊患者样本中,确定轻度认知障碍(MCI)亚型和受损认知域数量在初始评估时对向痴呆进展的预测作用。

方法

对 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因 MCI 就诊于记忆门诊的患者进行回顾性分析。使用剑桥认知评估(CAMCOG)的推荐截断分数将 MCI 患者分为四个亚型之一。二项逻辑回归分析用于确定 MCI 亚型和受损认知域数量作为痴呆预测因子的效用。

结果

共确定了 1188 例 MCI 诊断患者,其中 378 例(32%)进展为痴呆,中位[范围]诊断时间为 2 年[1-8.4]。649 例(55%)为遗忘型 MCI,539 例(45%)为非遗忘型 MCI。与非遗忘型 MCI 相比,遗忘型 MCI 是进展的显著预测因子(OR = 1.85,df = 1,P <.001)。受损认知域数量也是向痴呆进展的显著预测因子(OR = 1.07,df = 1,P =.01),但单/多域差异无统计学意义(OR = 1.29,df = 1,P =.36)。

结论

本研究表明,约 32%在记忆门诊诊断为 MCI 的患者进展为痴呆,中位进展时间为 2 年。遗忘型 MCI 进展为痴呆的可能性是非遗忘型 MCI 的近两倍,因此这是一个有用的区别。然而,我们的研究结果对单域和多域 MCI 区别的效用提出了质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验